Managing performance through employee attributes: implications for employee engagement

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the connection between performance management and employee engagement. More specifically, the authors address shortcomings in prior literature where employee performance has been controlled narrowly as cognitive task accomplishment. Accumulating evidence shows, however, that such performance-mediating factors as employee engagement constitute critical antecedents of employee and organizational performance. They can most effectively be influenced by attending sensitively to employees’ individual differences, which are ultimately driven by motifs and dispositions. Design/methodology/approach The study takes a quantitative approach to exploring predictors of employee engagement. The analysis is based on a sample of 503 online survey respondents from knowledge-intensive organizations. Findings The results indicate that employee engagement is driven more by employees’ inherent attributes than environmental factors. The analysis refuted the connection between engagement and social orientation, self-regulation and conscientiousness. Instead, the factors associating with employee engagement were analytical thinking, extroversion, systems thinking, assertiveness and leadership. Practical implications In this paper, the authors put forth a novel conceptual model of performance management, introducing new and evidence-based foci for effective people management that expand task performance to contextual performance and supplement quantifying approaches to performance control with the qualifying methodology. Originality/value Departing from the previously dominating frameworks of performance management that focused on task performance, this work extends to contextual performance and considers also employees’ psychological traits.

The role of HRM in the innovation of performance measurement and management systems: a multiple case study in SMEs

“…The PMMSs analysed reveal easily accessible and transparent performance measurements, which favour self-performance management. Furthermore, they respond to an actual challenge through a system to engage people (Bardoel et al, 2014;Kossek and Perrigino, 2016;Lappalainen et al, 2019). By the adoption of appropriate software and technological applications, companies create a PMMS where employees manage their continuous performance.…”

“My colleague is a robot” – exploring frontline employees' willingness to work with collaborative service robots

“…They form the psychological and emotional prerequisites for employees committing to tasks or engaging in work-related interactions. As such, they are directly involved in determining employees' satisfaction (Lee and Way, 2010) with their job and their level of engagement (Lappalainen et al. , 2019).…”

Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement

“…Teeroovengadum et al (2019) investigate PMSE from three types of organizational purposes-strategic, development, and administrative. Similarly, in another study, Lappalainen et al (2019) indicate that PMSE serves two main functions-judgmental and developmental. The first one is evaluative and helps make administrative decisions about employees, whereas the developmental part is related to its potential for high performance (McAfee & Champagne, 1993) leading to higher organizational outcomes (Kagaari et al, 2010).…”