2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing people with diabetes during the cancer palliation in the era of simultaneous care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, DM is, by itself, an increased cause of palliative enrolment in some countries with advanced health system integration as it can be considered as a life-threatening illness 5–7. Evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of DM have been developed by several scientific associations,8–12 which highlight that nutrition, pharmacological therapy, self-monitoring blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) targets should be individualised for each patient. Additionally, goals should be individualised based on the duration of DM, age or life expectancy, comorbid conditions, known cardiovascular disease or advanced microvascular complications, hypoglycaemia unawareness and individual patient considerations 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, DM is, by itself, an increased cause of palliative enrolment in some countries with advanced health system integration as it can be considered as a life-threatening illness 5–7. Evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of DM have been developed by several scientific associations,8–12 which highlight that nutrition, pharmacological therapy, self-monitoring blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) targets should be individualised for each patient. Additionally, goals should be individualised based on the duration of DM, age or life expectancy, comorbid conditions, known cardiovascular disease or advanced microvascular complications, hypoglycaemia unawareness and individual patient considerations 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%