2022
DOI: 10.1111/aman.13764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing, now becoming, refugees: Climate change and extractivism in the Republic of Nauru

Abstract: The Republic of Nauru, the world's smallest island state, was almost entirely economically dependent on the phosphate industry in the twentieth century as part of a colonial extractive arrangement. After the wealth Nauru derived was depleted by the 1990s, the by then sovereign state resurged on the back of the refugee industry, agreeing to process and resettle Australia's maritime asylum‐seeker populations. In this article, I explore how forms of refugee extractivism factor into Nauruans’ ontological experienc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas SEZs designed for external benefit create a spatial mismatch between harms and benefits, SEZs for local benefit that occupy the entirety of an SNIJ or island state cannot fully externalise harms. Focus on financial services, port services, passport sales, gaming, manufacturing, offshore detention, high‐end tourism, real estate speculation, and other specialised services supported by deregulation produces numerous negative social, economic and environmental impacts for islands (Behuria, 2022; Clark, 2013; Hampton & Jeyacheya, 2020; Morris, 2022; Perry, 2022). Even island smart eco‐cities for local benefit are problematic, given their dependence on exclusionary processes (Caprotti, 2014), and the fact that SEZ processes are enhanced by being islanded does not necessarily make SEZ processes good for islanders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas SEZs designed for external benefit create a spatial mismatch between harms and benefits, SEZs for local benefit that occupy the entirety of an SNIJ or island state cannot fully externalise harms. Focus on financial services, port services, passport sales, gaming, manufacturing, offshore detention, high‐end tourism, real estate speculation, and other specialised services supported by deregulation produces numerous negative social, economic and environmental impacts for islands (Behuria, 2022; Clark, 2013; Hampton & Jeyacheya, 2020; Morris, 2022; Perry, 2022). Even island smart eco‐cities for local benefit are problematic, given their dependence on exclusionary processes (Caprotti, 2014), and the fact that SEZ processes are enhanced by being islanded does not necessarily make SEZ processes good for islanders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%