Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments

Abstract

In highly dynamic environments, characterized by changing customer preferences and uncertainty about competitive products, managing the development of a new product is a complex managerial task. The traditional practice, recommended in the literature, of reaching a sharp definition early in the new product development (NPD) process may not be optimal, desirable or even feasible in such dynamic situations. Under high uncertainty, forcing early finalization of specifications may result in a firm getting locked into an incorrect definition. Based on our study of NPD in the high technology industry, we present a model of an approach called real-time definition, in which a firm adapts its product definition process to the market and competitive environment. Uncertainty in the product definition is resolved through frequent, repeated interactions with customers and using a flexible development process. We find that early definition is optimal only in a limited set of situations. To maximize its anticipated profits, a firm should tune its definition process to the prevailing level of market uncertainty, the marginal value of information obtained from the customer during the NPD process, and its own risk-profile and internal development capabilities. Effects of competition on a firm's definition approach are also examined, and implications for managers of a NPD process are presented using a conceptual framework.New Product Development, Product Definition, Dynamic Environments

Framing innovation: negotiating shared frames during early design phases

“…Khurana and Rosenthal, 1997;Bhattacharya, Krishnan and Mahajan, 1998) is normative and assumes highly rational team practices. It identifies optimal design processes and tools, but does little to address cognitive and social limitations on the adoption and effectiveness of the tools.…”

Investigação sobre a organização do trabalho para a inovação e transição tecnológica no setor elétrico brasileiro

“…Knowledge is key resource for organizations that innovate (Salerno, 2004;Marx, 2011). Companies that have a process for generating and attracting ides to R&D projects may have less involvement and possibly lower chance of success of the program in the development of new technologies that contribute to increasing the electric system efficiency for technological transition (Bhattacharya et al, 1998;Cooper & Perspective, 2008).…”

Process models in design and development

“…For instance, Bhattacharya et al (1998) study to what degree a flexible process in which a design specification is evolved by repeated user feedback can be justified, considering that this may increase product attractiveness and thus sales, but leaves less time to optimise the design which may result in higher production costs. Several factors that should influence the choice of process structure are studied, including market uncertainty, the firm's appetite for risk, and the value of information that can be gained from customer feedback.…”