2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02974-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing lines of therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer: real-life snapshot from a multicenter cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A real-life multicentric series showed that patients receiving EZ as first-line treatment had significantly higher PSA response (95.9% vs. 67%, p < 0.001), comparable toxicity rate (10.2% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.437), and PFS probabilities (p = 0.145) compared to AA, while EZ or radiometabolic therapy as second-line treatment displayed equivalent toxicity and PSA response rates to those observed on first-line (11.1% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.77; 73.1% vs. 77.4%, p = 0.62, respectively) [9]. Moreover, 2-year PFS, CSS, and OS probabilities were comparable between first-and second-line cohorts (12.1% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.07; 85.7% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.98; 71% vs. 80.3%, p = 0.66, respectively) [9]. In a more recent series of 117 chemo-naïve mCRPC patients who received AA or EZ as first-line therapy, eight patients underwent salvage chemotherapy after first-line failure and 28 patients shifted to a second-line therapy [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A real-life multicentric series showed that patients receiving EZ as first-line treatment had significantly higher PSA response (95.9% vs. 67%, p < 0.001), comparable toxicity rate (10.2% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.437), and PFS probabilities (p = 0.145) compared to AA, while EZ or radiometabolic therapy as second-line treatment displayed equivalent toxicity and PSA response rates to those observed on first-line (11.1% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.77; 73.1% vs. 77.4%, p = 0.62, respectively) [9]. Moreover, 2-year PFS, CSS, and OS probabilities were comparable between first-and second-line cohorts (12.1% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.07; 85.7% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.98; 71% vs. 80.3%, p = 0.66, respectively) [9]. In a more recent series of 117 chemo-naïve mCRPC patients who received AA or EZ as first-line therapy, eight patients underwent salvage chemotherapy after first-line failure and 28 patients shifted to a second-line therapy [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The dataset was queried for "high-volume disease". High tumor burden was defined based on the radiological extent of disease, as bulky positive nodes (≥5 cm) or more than 6 bone metastases at mCRPC [9]. Symptoms were not considered a reason for defining a patient as high-volume.…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But ADT has been associated with some adverse effects including sexual dysfunction, metabolic disturbances, cognitive defects, weight gain, and gynecomastia. While abiraterone has been associated with adverse cardiac effects, liver function test abnormalities, hypertension, and hypokalemia, enzalutamide increases the incidence of hypertension and fatigue [45][46][47]. Abiraterone might also increase the risk of hypoglycemia in prostate cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving concurrent glucose-lowering therapy.…”
Section: Metastatic (M1) Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%