2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchas.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing laboratory biomedical waste using a large on-site autoclave–shredder

Abstract: In 2002 Yale University purchased, installed, and began operating an on-site biomedical waste treatment system at its School of Medicine campus consisting of a large autoclave and shredder. The system is currently operating, and has served the University well. In this paper we describe how biomedical waste is identified, separated at the source, collected, and managed at Yale. We explain the rationale for using this system, as well as its operation, costs, and benefits to the University.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its benefits include low cost of operation, the method is easy to operate, environmentally friendly as it involves no hazardous emission etc. [16]. On the other hand, it is characterised by certain deficiencies such as foul odour, the need for a shredder to condense the waste size as well as the fact that it is not suitable for all types of waste unlike incinerator.…”
Section: Biomedical Waste Management Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its benefits include low cost of operation, the method is easy to operate, environmentally friendly as it involves no hazardous emission etc. [16]. On the other hand, it is characterised by certain deficiencies such as foul odour, the need for a shredder to condense the waste size as well as the fact that it is not suitable for all types of waste unlike incinerator.…”
Section: Biomedical Waste Management Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process involves waste at deadly temperatures that infect and possibly kill pathogens. (Armstrong et al, 2010). Autoclaves are considered more expensive than incineration (Jang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Medical Waste Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the biggest obstacles to autoclaving is that the size of the waste introduced into the system is not reduced. Landfills that still cause many environmental threats many studies show that autoclave shredders are the best alternative to treating medical waste (Armstrong et al, 2010, Brenda et al 2010.…”
Section: Medical Waste Treatment Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncontrolled burning of medical wastes may pollute the air with acidic gases, dioxins, furans and heavy metals [2]. A clear relationship between the burning of chlorinated organic chemical products and wastes, especially PVC and dioxin emissions from combustion facilities was reported by a host of studies conducted at the University of Florida [3,4,5,6,7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%