1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02743940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing interprocessor delays in distributed recursive algorithms

Abstract: For a class of distributed recursive algorithms, it is shown that a stochastic approximation-like tapering stepsize routine suppresses the effects of interprocessor delays.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided that {b(n)} also satisfy the conditions stipulated in [6], the delays do not affect the conclusions for the same reasons as in [6]. This underscores the role of decreasing step-sizes in controlling errors due to delays, first highlighted in [11]. Under (A8), one can mimic the arguments of the preceding section with minor differences to conclude that Theorem 3 continues to hold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Provided that {b(n)} also satisfy the conditions stipulated in [6], the delays do not affect the conclusions for the same reasons as in [6]. This underscores the role of decreasing step-sizes in controlling errors due to delays, first highlighted in [11]. Under (A8), one can mimic the arguments of the preceding section with minor differences to conclude that Theorem 3 continues to hold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…If the simulation-based algorithm is implemented in a distributed manner using several processors, it is natural to have interprocessor communication delays. Mercifully, under very mild conditions these delays do not affect the convergence analysis, as shown in Borkar and Phansalkar [4]. Intuitively, the reason is that the time scaling n -> /" is sublinear and concave and thus squeezes the time intervals of any fixed length into smaller and smaller time intervals as time goes on.…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The analysis of Borkar and Phansalkar [4] allows, in fact, more general delays, namely, random delays satisfying a mild conditional moment condition. The reader is referred to Borkar and Phansalkar [4] for details.…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since (57) holds, the proof for Theorem 3.4 i) is still applicable. As a result, {X k } is a.s. bounded and there exists a positive integer k 0 such that the compact form (15) holds. Then by (55) we obtain that ∞ k=0 γ k ε i,k < ∞ a.s., and hence A5 holds for almost all ω.…”
Section: A Distributed Pcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the performance gap between the distributed and the centralized stochastic approximation algorithms is investigated in [14]. The asynchronous and distributed stochastic approximation algorithms are also addressed in [15], [16] with the components separately estimated at different processors. However, is noticed that almost all aforementioned SA-based distributed algorithms require rather restrictive conditions to guarantee convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%