Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a new framework for managing intellectual capital (IC) inside a university considering the collective intelligence perspective. Design/methodology/approach – The research method uses the fourth stage of IC research and adopts the collective intelligence approach. The underlying assumption behind the framework is to consider the university as a collective intelligence system in which the tangible and intellectual assets are coordinated towards the achievement of strategic goals. Findings – The conceptual framework for IC management harnesses the power of IC, collectively created by the engagement of multiple stakeholders inside the university network. The main components are the final goal of a university (what); the collective human capital to achieve the goal (who); the processes activated inside the university (how); and finally the motivations behind the achievement of the goal (why). Research limitations/implications – The research is exploratory and the framework offers opportunities for refinement. Future research is needed to verify the application of the framework to other organisations in the public sector intended as collective intelligence systems. A new perspective for managing IC in universities adopting the collective intelligence approach is developed. Contribution to the fourth stage (ecosystem) of IC research is highlighted, expanding the concept of IC value creation beyond the university into wider society. Practical implications – The framework can be used to manage IC strategically in all the systems interpreted as collective intelligence systems in which the role of IC creation from multiple actors is relevant. This makes possible the understanding of how IC helps create value for the society and the region in which the university operates. Originality/value – The originality of the paper is in bringing together issues usually dealt within the literature in separate domains, such as IC management and collective intelligence perspective. The concept of collective intelligence remains an unexplored field in relation to IC management in the public sector. The collective intelligence approach provides a novel contribution to managing IC and is intended to inspire future research.

Moving from Social and Sustainability Reporting to Integrated Reporting: Exploring the Potential of Italian Public-Funded Universities’ Reports

“…In this globalized context, universities have become more competitive and business-oriented as distinctly shown by the introduction of concepts like "entrepreneurial universities" [8,21,31], which reveal the emphasis put on new entrepreneurial competencies and goals universities are expected to fulfil. The co-occurrence of increased market competition, reduction of public funds and widespread calls for greater transparency have contributed to reshape the role and identity of universities [32,33].…”

Academic spinoffs as a value driver for intellectual capital: the case of the University of Pisa

“…While IC has been explored mainly in the private sector, there is a gap in studies of IC creation in universities (Kong and Prior, 2008). Some early studies dealt with IC in universities in terms of management practices (Hellström and Husted 2004;Ramirez, 2010;Secundo et al, 2016), measurement, and reporting (Fazlagic, 2005;Leitner, 2004). Nonetheless, IC's contributions to the value creation process in universities have remained widely unaddressed Secundo et al, 2017).…”

Competitive Advantage as a Mediating Variable to the Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance

“…Some prior research study found the significant effect of IC to competitive advantage, but contrary other research showed the vice versa. We also should pay more attention to IC management as the trigger to increase competitiveness [12]. IC component (relational capital, structural capital, and human capital) grant relative contribution to competitive advantage [1] it also created from organization culture [13].…”

“…Second, the human valueadded resources and maintained customer relationships represent competitive advantages; and finally, performance was used to explain corporate value [1]. Additionally, this paper uses the IC perspective to describe the value-creating process [12]. Competitive Advantage has significant mediating the intellectual capital and financial performance association in micro finance industry [2].…”