2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing fishing capacity in tuna regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs): Development and state of the art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Straddling stocks are shared among exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and high seas, but approximately 40 % of the world's tuna are caught in the high seas, providing a challenge to their conservation and management (Allen et al 2010). Such a situation poses conservation and management issues of jurisdiction under international law and multilateral cooperation to define property rights and management actions (Aranda et al 2012). Such management actions need to consider the real and potential impact according to their expected outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Straddling stocks are shared among exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and high seas, but approximately 40 % of the world's tuna are caught in the high seas, providing a challenge to their conservation and management (Allen et al 2010). Such a situation poses conservation and management issues of jurisdiction under international law and multilateral cooperation to define property rights and management actions (Aranda et al 2012). Such management actions need to consider the real and potential impact according to their expected outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to the UNFSA is the promotion of science-based and precautionary approaches to set limit reference points for fishing effort. 1 But in spite of these requirements for RFMOs being clearly set out in the UNFSA their application has remained patchy at best (see Aranda et al 2012). …”
Section: Tuna Institutions Facing Dynamic Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Havice et al 2010, Aranda et al 2012, Bruyn et al 2013 argue that the adoption (or not) of HCRs and reference points by RFMOs is a function of the (mis)alignment of political and economic goals of participating states given their vested interests in different species of tuna, the fishing gears used to catch them and the protection of often long standing access arrangements (see also Bailey et al, 2013. In other words, at the RFMO levels, these studies claim that the old tuna regimes or institutions have largely failed to provide adequate incentives for states and fishing industries to agree to precautionary approaches.…”
Section: Inadequate Incentives and Misalignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations