1983
DOI: 10.1016/0090-2616(83)90022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing continuity in the family-owned business

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
222
1
13

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
222
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the primary manifestations is long-term orientation (Astrachan 2010;James 1999). The firm is managed with future generations in mind, often by CEOs whose job tenure greatly exceeds those of non-family firms (Beckhard and Dyer 1983). A long-term orientation ensures future returns and also lowers the risk level of the firm.…”
Section: Decision-making Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the primary manifestations is long-term orientation (Astrachan 2010;James 1999). The firm is managed with future generations in mind, often by CEOs whose job tenure greatly exceeds those of non-family firms (Beckhard and Dyer 1983). A long-term orientation ensures future returns and also lowers the risk level of the firm.…”
Section: Decision-making Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accomplish these goals, members of the next generation must be willing to continue the family business and be able to effectively recognise and exploit viable opportunities that ensure that the business continues after they have been given control (Kellermanns et al, 2008). Despite succession being an important goal in many family firms, approximately 70% of family firms do not make the transition from the first generation to the next (Beckhard and Dyer, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, recognising that family firm founders often rely on family members to operate the business throughout the life of the firm (Cruz, Justo and De Castro, 2012) and that the average lifespan of a family firm is approximately 23 years (Beckhard and Dyer, 1983), children raised in these environments will increasingly be exposed to entrepreneurial behaviours such as opportunity recognition, evaluation and exploitation, as time goes by (Chlosta et al, 2012;Kellermanns et al, 2008). It is likely that family routines in these family systems are more organised around business functions relative to family systems where parents are not self-employed (Bowen, 1993;Minuchin, 1974).…”
Section: Family Business Context Moderates Family Influences On Intenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers and owners who want to reap the performance benefits of succession planning should consider involving family-member employees in regular conversations related to the firm's future because of the opportunities to learn from diverse viewpoints (Edmondson, 1999). Although managers may avoid these kinds of interactions to limit the painful effects of conflict (Beckhard and Dyer, 1983) that can be found in family firms (Eddleston and Kellermanns, 2007), or because control over family firms is often centralised in one manager even though ownership is dispersed across many family members (Gersick, 1997), they can still encourage beneficial interactions by providing open forums for employees to share ideas and information learned during conferences or interactions with clients and suppliers. Although leadership alone is insufficient for enforcing open knowledge-sharing environments, managers can help to foster these exchanges by listening to employees carefully, providing time for reflection, and encouraging employees with different points of view to share them (Garvin, Edmondson and Gino, 2008).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%