“…From those, 4429 were excluded after reading titles and abstracts. A total of 176 records were completely assessed for eligibility, of which 84 studies were excluded with reasons: 70 studies did not compare endometriosis vs control or Stage III/IV vs Stage I/II endometriosis undergoing ART; eight studies did not report any of the evaluated outcomes; five studies included participants reported in newer or larger studies; and one study included only women who achieved pregnancy. We included 92 studies in this review, of which 78 studies were included in the quantitative meta‐analysis: 21 for both comparisons; 49 only for the comparison ‘endometriosis vs control’; and eight only for the comparison ‘Stage III/IV vs Stage I/II endometriosis’.…”
“…From those, 4429 were excluded after reading titles and abstracts. A total of 176 records were completely assessed for eligibility, of which 84 studies were excluded with reasons: 70 studies did not compare endometriosis vs control or Stage III/IV vs Stage I/II endometriosis undergoing ART; eight studies did not report any of the evaluated outcomes; five studies included participants reported in newer or larger studies; and one study included only women who achieved pregnancy. We included 92 studies in this review, of which 78 studies were included in the quantitative meta‐analysis: 21 for both comparisons; 49 only for the comparison ‘endometriosis vs control’; and eight only for the comparison ‘Stage III/IV vs Stage I/II endometriosis’.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.