Managing Change toward Adaptive Water Management through Social Learning

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The management of water resources is currently undergoing a paradigm shift toward a more integrated and participatory management style. This paper highlights the need to fully take into account the complexity of the systems to be managed and to give more attention to uncertainties. Achieving this requires adaptive management approaches that can more generally be defined as systematic strategies for improving management policies and practices by learning from the outcomes of previous management actions. This paper describes how the principles of adaptive water management might improve the conceptual and methodological base for sustainable and integrated water management in an uncertain and complex world. Critical debate is structured around four questions: (1) What types of uncertainty need to be taken into account in water management? (2) How does adaptive management account for uncertainty? (3) What are the characteristics of adaptive management regimes? (4) What is the role of social learning in managing change? Major transformation processes are needed because, in many cases, the structural requirements, e.g., adaptive institutions and a flexible technical infrastructure, for adaptive management are not available. In conclusion, we itemize a number of research needs and summarize practical recommendations based on the current state of knowledge.

Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation

“…Like innovation in the corporate context, research suggests that adaptive learning approaches, allowing for exploration and experimentation, are better suited for ecosystem-based management than are rigid approaches that have set prescriptions for resource use (Garaway and Arthur 2004;Pahl-Wostl et al 2007). Corporate strategies aimed at innovating for sustainable development, for example, are encouraged by laws and regulations that reflect social expectations, as opposed to traditional attempts to compel change (Kenny et al 2011).…”

Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance: a critical institutional reading

“…From this time onward, Holling and others (Holling 1973, 1978, Holling and Meffet 1996, Gunderson and Holling 2002 argued against the forms of technocratic, top-down, and efficiencyoriented environmental management that came to prominence in the 20th Century. In particular, they claim that this rigid approach to management results in pathological outcomes (Holling and Meffet 1996) and stifles the innovation needed to manage effectively in an unstable operating environment (Glasbergen 1998, Pahl-Wostl 2006, Pahl-Wostl et al 2007). …”

Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital

“…Adaptive governance refers to flexible and learning-based collaborations and decision-making processes involving both state and nonstate actors, often at multiple levels, with the aim to adaptively negotiate and coordinate management of socialecological systems and ecosystem services across landscapes and seascapes (6)(7)(8). The collaboration involves building knowledge and understanding of ecosystem dynamics and services, feeding such knowledge into adaptive management practices, supporting flexible institutions and multilevel governance systems, and dealing with external perturbations, uncertainty, and surprise (6).…”