Managing Capital Market Frictions via Cost-Reduction Investments

Abstract

Problem definition: We examine how the presence of capital market frictions influences the decision to invest in production cost reduction and the resultant production volume. This investment can increase the firm’s cash flow by increasing the profit margin, but it can also decrease the firm’s risk-free cash reserves and thus affect its exposure to capital market frictions. Academic/practical relevance: Process improvement aimed at production cost reduction has generated myriad of theoretical questions about efficient investment options and capacity choices. From a managerial perspective, process improvement is a fundamental concern in operations strategy. Nevertheless, its analysis typically excludes financial constraints by assuming a perfect capital market. Methodology: We formulate a two-stage profit maximization model in which a capital-constrained firm commits to a cost-reduction investment in the first stage in anticipation of its production decision in the second stage of this two-stage decision process. The firm considers capital market frictions when making decisions at each stage, while considering uncertainty in demand for its offering and in reducing its unit production cost. Results: When a firm faces small initial capital and low preinvestment unit production costs, it can benefit from investing in production cost reduction in the presence of capital market frictions more so than in their absence. Moreover, uncertainty in the production cost reduction mitigates the impact of market frictions on the net benefit (i.e., additional profit), whereas demand uncertainty decreases the feasible parameter space, where investing in production cost reduction is optimal. Managerial implications: A firm’s decision to invest in production cost reduction affects its operational and financial capabilities. Managers should thus consider this investment as an operational hedge not only against the uncertainty of matching supply and demand but also against exposure to capital market frictions and the resultant financial risk.

Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities

“…In contrast, this section focuses on the interactions between operational and financing aspects to achieve joint optimization in single-firm settings, competitive settings, or multi-player networks, respectively. In this stream, operational perspectives could include capacity investment, production planning, inventory/sourcing management, and incentive alignment; while the financial aspects incorporate capital structure, payment time, cash allocation, dividend issuing, subsidy, covenant, and capital market frictions (Tanrisever et al 2020b) such as information asymmetry, transactions cost, liquidity shock, interest rates, taxation, and bankruptcy. Next, we adopt a process view and categorize this research stream as follows.…”

Dynamic Trade Finance in the Presence of Information Frictions and FinTech

“…Differently, we focus on bank-intermediated trade finance, which is particularly relevant when the seller (exporter) is financially constrained. In the area of OM, our work is most related to the literature on OM-Finance interface (Babich and Sobel 2004, Boyabatlı and Toktay 2011, Yang et al 2015, Iancu et al 2017, Lai and Xiao 2018, Ning and Babich 2018, Luo and Shang 2019, Tanrisever et al 2021, Zhang et al 2022. This stream of literature has examined various forms of trade and supply chain finance, including trade credit (Babich and Tang 2012, Kouvelis and Zhao 2012, Peura et al 2017, Yang and Birge 2018, Chod et al 2019b, Chen et al 2020, receivables financing (Tunca and Zhu 2018, Hu et al 2018, Kouvelis and Xu 2021, purchase order financing (Tang et al 2018, Reindorp et al 2018, and logistics financing (Chen et al 2018).…”

Additional contract selection and parameter design under supplier credit guarantee financing

“…h(x) = f (x)/ F (x) and H(x) = xh(x) represent the failure rate and the generalized failure rate, respectively, and both increase with x, where F (x) = 1 − F (x). To reduce computational complexity and enable analytical tractability, we assume that , [57], [33], [44]) when designing the optimal contract parameters and the numerical analysis. Assumption 3.…”