2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have theoretically explored TDC schemes from a mathematical perspective by modelling traffic flows and times under different credit allocation and traveller assumptions (e.g., Yang and Wang, 2011;Nie, 2012;Xiao et al, 2013;Bao et al, 2014). However, until now, little effort has been made to investigate drivers' responses to TDC schemes at the individual level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have theoretically explored TDC schemes from a mathematical perspective by modelling traffic flows and times under different credit allocation and traveller assumptions (e.g., Yang and Wang, 2011;Nie, 2012;Xiao et al, 2013;Bao et al, 2014). However, until now, little effort has been made to investigate drivers' responses to TDC schemes at the individual level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiao et al (2013) extended it to departure time choice problem. See a review on the studies about TC in Grant-Muller and Xu (2014).…”
Section: Congestion Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second set of studies takes a mathematical programming approach, studying user equilibrium and market equilibrium in the context of traffic flows and credit price under different assumptions, for example fixed/elastic demand, homogeneous/heterogeneous travellers, different initial credit allocations (e.g. Nie, 2012;Wang, Gao, Xu, & Sun, 2014;Xiao, Qian, & Zhang, 2013;Yang & Wang, 2011). The third domain consists of studies that empirically investigate travel behaviour under TC schemes at the individual level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%