2017
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2017.1350777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Bibliographic Data Quality for Electronic Resources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…154 Van Kleeck et al investigated issues in the quality management of metadata of electronic resources to assess in supporting user tasks of finding, selecting, and accessing library holdings as well as identifying the potential for increasing efficiencies in acquisition and cataloging workflow. 155 They evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records mostly provided by their vendors and compared them with those of OCLC and found that the latter has better support users in resource discovery and access. 156 From the management perspective, the complexity and volume of bibliographic metadata and the method of ingesting it to the catalog emphasize the selection of highest quality records.…”
Section: Quality Of Linked Bibliographic Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…154 Van Kleeck et al investigated issues in the quality management of metadata of electronic resources to assess in supporting user tasks of finding, selecting, and accessing library holdings as well as identifying the potential for increasing efficiencies in acquisition and cataloging workflow. 155 They evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records mostly provided by their vendors and compared them with those of OCLC and found that the latter has better support users in resource discovery and access. 156 From the management perspective, the complexity and volume of bibliographic metadata and the method of ingesting it to the catalog emphasize the selection of highest quality records.…”
Section: Quality Of Linked Bibliographic Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%