This paper is intended to circulate work that readers might otherwise be unable to access. If your institution does not have a copy or an order for a copy of the above work this can be placed here http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118701429.html Recent decades have witnessed two contradictions in global mobility. Hypermobile flows of capital and goods cascading around the globe, facilitated by an increasingly hegemonic neoliberal economic model and an accompanying web of trade agreements, are concurrent with increasingly restricted mobility of persons-at least those emergent from the global South (Bauman 1998). The construction through law, technology, fortification and intensified policing of the 'wall around the West' (Andreas & Snyder 2000) has resulted in a massive production of 'illegal aliens' in the global North (Fassin 2011, p. 214). As the potential pathways for those seeking to escape economic deprivation or political and social persecution in the global South have been progressively barricaded, so too have such movements been progressively criminalized. The fabrication of the 'wall around the West' has witnessed the emergence of a substantial border control apparatus, often technologically mediated and buttressed by punitive legal developments, that is itself criminogenic and instrumental in the construction of 'deviant' migrant identities. Border control has also been loosened from its moorings, no longer a distinct geographical line but deterritorialized (Walters 2006) so that now it is possible to speak of 'ubiquitous borders' (Wilson & Weber 2008) that may be enacted before, at and after the physical borderline at a variety of switch points and by a multiplicity of agents. The exclusion and construction of deviant migrant identities is intertwined with two other notable developments. One is the weakening of the nation-state form, and there is a significant scholarship which interprets intensifying border control and practices of exclusion in terms of 'performances' of sovereignty. This is an argument that suggests that under conditions of neoliberal globalization, states with diminished control of economic and social questions within their boundaries increasingly turn to border security and migration control as key 'performances' asserting their continued relevance and strength (Wilson and Weber 2008;