Managerial Technique and Worker Subjectivity in Dialogue: Understanding Overwork in China’s Internet Industry

Abstract

The article theorises three different organisational processes that uniquely organise and normalise overwork in China’s Internet industry: coercive formalised overtime schedule, normative informal overtime culture, and disguised work-related time expenditure, work-for-labour. It reveals the ‘double flexibility’ in management strategy, namely, flexible, combined use of coercive and normative control techniques inside the company in addition to its pursuit of flexibility in employment relationships. It then theorises the pendulum movement of worker subjectivity between the ‘self-as-property’ metaphor, which justifies market competition as meritocracy and encourages individuals to polish ‘employability’ in overwork efficiently, and ‘self-as-business’ metaphor, which reflects a conventional, Marxist understanding of employment relationships. The pendulum movement is manifested in the spectrum of workplace behaviours, ranging from the individualised psychological distancing to the collective noncompliance and online activism. The article provides a dynamic understanding of labour relations through the management-labour dialogue in the Chinese Internet industry.

Infrastructural capitalism in China: Alibaba, its corporate culture and three infrastructural mechanisms

“…The last operational mechanism of infrastructural capitalism is exemplified by how Alibaba reconfigured online and offline capital-labour relations. To justify its employees' overwork commitment as 'altruistic' or self-sacrificial for the nation's technological progressivism (Li, 2023), a paradoxical entanglement of internal and global competition as the moral obligation and gamified aspirations of Alibaba workersto achieve the 'Chinese Dream' 3 was repeatedly promoted within the company. Indeed, such politicised aspirations and emotive work commitment serve as the 'infrastructural affects' (Parks, 2016) which support the continuous online-and-offline sensorial control of infrastructural capitalism.…”

A study on how to enhance the well-being of young professionals confronting internal overcompetition in China: Prospect of reducing the stress of Nei Juan

“…This competitive drive fosters a climate where businesses strive for excellence, pushing boundaries and contributing to global progress. However, this fervent competition has a shadow side, marked by an overwork culture, as evidenced in the infamous "996" work schedule (Li, 2023). This dark aspect raises concerns about workers' well-being, leading the government to enact measures to address excessive overtime.…”

Class, labour conflict, and workers’ organisation

“…By contrast, male tech migrants have obtained a relatively higher social-economic status as white-collar workers and are more integrated into urban life with greater consumption power. Indeed, individual workers would experience very different degrees of managerial control and autonomy (Li 2022;Vallas & Hill 2018).…”