2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial secrecy and intellectual asset protection in SMEs: The role of institutional environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies document that the biggest threat firms face regarding the appropriation of value created through their innovative activities is not the prying eyes of competitors, but leakage of vital knowledge through their current and former organizational members in whom that knowledge is embedded (Delerue & Lejeune, 2011; Hannah, 2005, 2006; Manhart & Thalmann, 2015; Ritala et al, 2015). In the absence of strong formal institutional mechanisms preventing such knowledge leakage or restricting the use of leaked knowledge by potential competitors, an “institutional void” exists (Khanna & Palepu, 1997; Puffer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies document that the biggest threat firms face regarding the appropriation of value created through their innovative activities is not the prying eyes of competitors, but leakage of vital knowledge through their current and former organizational members in whom that knowledge is embedded (Delerue & Lejeune, 2011; Hannah, 2005, 2006; Manhart & Thalmann, 2015; Ritala et al, 2015). In the absence of strong formal institutional mechanisms preventing such knowledge leakage or restricting the use of leaked knowledge by potential competitors, an “institutional void” exists (Khanna & Palepu, 1997; Puffer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important examples include the economic and legal theory of intellectual property ownership (e.g. Anton & Yao, 2004; Cheung, 1982; Epstein, 2004; Maurer & Zugelder, 2000; Scheppele, 1988; Stead & Cross, 2009; Swedberg, 2003); and, relatedly, the organizational dilemmas of protecting innovations (Delerue & Lejeune, 2011; Dougherty, 2001; Hannah, 2007; Katila et al, 2008; Knott & Posen, 2009; Teece, 1986). These literatures are mostly concerned with what Goffman calls ‘strategic secrecy’ (1959, p. 141), namely, the protection of valuable organizational assets through concealment.…”
Section: Approaching Organizational Secrecymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Intellectual Property Law can provide various channels for managers to realize the value of intellectual property, which in turn determines the competitiveness of organizations; Trademark Law is used to protect the brand and reputation of firms, which will influence their financial performances indirectly [11]. In a sample of 297 SMEs from 19 countries, Delerue & Lejeunefound that the attributes of institutional environment can explain managerial use of secrecy [12]. Compared with large companies, it is more important for SMEs to have supporting legal and institutional rules [13].…”
Section: A Influence Of Rse On Sme Performancementioning
confidence: 99%