1989
DOI: 10.2307/1349281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial Performance and Income Variability for a Sample of Illinois Cash Grain Producers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the fit seems to be relatively better for the rented-in land model compared with the rented-out land model. The typical value of McFadden's R 2 lies between 0.20 and 0.40 (Sonka et al, 1989) which is also seen in our results. The implication is that our full models are better than the intercept only models.…”
Section: Determinants Of Participation In the Land Rental Marketsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Overall, the fit seems to be relatively better for the rented-in land model compared with the rented-out land model. The typical value of McFadden's R 2 lies between 0.20 and 0.40 (Sonka et al, 1989) which is also seen in our results. The implication is that our full models are better than the intercept only models.…”
Section: Determinants Of Participation In the Land Rental Marketsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The elasticity estimates indicate that the price of energy has a major positive impact on the probability of adopting a co-generator; the probability of adopting where log L 0 is the value of log-likelihood function subject to the constraint that all regression coefficients except the constant term are zero, and log L(b) is the maximum value of the log-likelihood function without constraints (Veall and Zimmerman, 1996). McFadden R 2 in the range of 0.2-0.4 are typical for logit models (Sonka et al, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The values of McFadden's R^ are 0-16 and 0-34 for Models I and II, respectively. These are typical for logit models (Sonka, Hornbaker & Hudson 1989;Harper et al 1990), The second measure shows the predictive power of the models defined by the proportion of correctly predicted outcomes. The logit regression correctly predicted almost 71% of the cases in Model 1 and 81% in Model II, Influences of the explanatory variables on the probability of outcomes in both the models Table 5 in terms of coefficients and f-values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%