2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial overconfidence in high and low valuation markets and gains to acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the market reaction to transaction announcement in the group of bidders with overconfident CFOs is more negative than for the median firm. Croci, Petmezas, and Vagenas-Nanos (2010), using similar methodology on stock option to Malmendier and Tate (2008) and merger data from the United Kingdom, confirm that highly overconfident CEOs lead their firms into more value-destroying acquisitions than their less confident counterparts. John, Liu, and Taffler (2011) explore the parallel role played by overconfident target firm CEOs in explaining the takeover premium and value destruction in such deals.…”
Section: Mergers and Acquisitionsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…On average, the market reaction to transaction announcement in the group of bidders with overconfident CFOs is more negative than for the median firm. Croci, Petmezas, and Vagenas-Nanos (2010), using similar methodology on stock option to Malmendier and Tate (2008) and merger data from the United Kingdom, confirm that highly overconfident CEOs lead their firms into more value-destroying acquisitions than their less confident counterparts. John, Liu, and Taffler (2011) explore the parallel role played by overconfident target firm CEOs in explaining the takeover premium and value destruction in such deals.…”
Section: Mergers and Acquisitionsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, M&A activity in years with lower P/E ratios is value creating for acquiring shareholders. On the other hand, deals during boom phases are rather viewed as wasteful investment that is often motivated by managerial over-confidence or hubris behavior as proposed by Croci, Petmezas, and Vagenas-Nanos (2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Croci et al . () study of UK M&As from 1990 to 2005 also reported insignificant mean monthly ARs. Subsequent studies employing the three‐factor model display mixed results.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 94%