1969
DOI: 10.2307/2391131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial Models of Organizational Effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The debates in organizational theory about organizational effectiveness have been started a while ago (Georgopoulos & Tannenbaum, 1957;Mahoney & Weitzel, 1969;Steers, 1975;Campbell, 1977) and they are still relevant (Matthews, 2011). The debates about the essence of effectiveness of the development of organization were presented in detailed review of (Astley & Van de Ven, 1983), where six main areas of discussions were: System versus Individual Action; Adaptation versus Selection Debates; Environmental Constraints versus Strategic Choice; "Natural" versus "Social" Environment discussion; Individual versus Collective Actions Organizational Behavior and Organization versus Institution Debates.…”
Section: Models Of Microeconomic Stabilization: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debates in organizational theory about organizational effectiveness have been started a while ago (Georgopoulos & Tannenbaum, 1957;Mahoney & Weitzel, 1969;Steers, 1975;Campbell, 1977) and they are still relevant (Matthews, 2011). The debates about the essence of effectiveness of the development of organization were presented in detailed review of (Astley & Van de Ven, 1983), where six main areas of discussions were: System versus Individual Action; Adaptation versus Selection Debates; Environmental Constraints versus Strategic Choice; "Natural" versus "Social" Environment discussion; Individual versus Collective Actions Organizational Behavior and Organization versus Institution Debates.…”
Section: Models Of Microeconomic Stabilization: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In discussing the concept of organizational effectiveness, Mahoney and Weitzel (1969) point out the similarities between the problem of defining effectiveness and the "criterion problem" that has plagued personnel psychologists for many years. Thorndike (1949) differeitiated three sets of criteria frr research on employee selection: ultimate, intermediate, and immediate.…”
Section: Organizational Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in fact, is what has happened in the organizational effectiveness research literature. A number of researchers have attempted to describe various models of organizational effectiveness (Mahoney & Weitzel, 1969;Campbell, Bownas, Peterson, & Dunnett, 1974;Engel, 1977;Goodman & Pennings, 1976;Steers, Porter, Mowday, & Stone, 1975;Price, 1968;Coulter, 1979;Mahoney & Frost, 1974). The dimensions of effectiveness growing out of several dozen models were cataloged by Campbell et al, 1974 Perhaps a better way to think of organizational effectiveness is as an underlying construct which has no direct operational definition, but which constitutes a model or theory of what organizational effectiveness is (1974, p.5).…”
Section: Organizational Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin and Parker (1997) present that market (private) oriented goals focus on commercial, consumer oriented, adaptable, market priced and output/outcome focused principles. To achieve such goals, one must consider that Mahoney and Weitzel (1969) give reference to the use of efficiency as a determinate criteria for the assessment of organisational effectiveness, and thus the efficient achievement of one's organisational goals can be said to be effective. With such high level goals defined by the focus ICO as a 65% reduction in project concept phases, 40% quicker overall delivery times, 20% CAPEX reduction and a 0% OPEX increase, the successful delivery of infrastructure is thusly concerned with managing organisational transitions toward achieving such goals in as an efficient manner as possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%