Managerial Discretion

Abstract

Managerial discretion is the latitude of action afforded to a manager. This literature, classically focused at the executive level, reconciles population ecology’s assertion that executives ultimately have little influence over firm-level outcomes and strategic choice theory’s assertion that executives make strategic decisions and thus have considerable influence over firm-level outcomes. Though generally viewed in the management literature as an opportunity for executives to positively affect performance and increase value, the literature in finance and economics argues that managerial discretion represents a cost to shareholders from potential opportunism or other self-serving behaviors. Within the management literature, scholars posit three categories (i.e., forces) that constrain or enable executives: (1) the task environment (i.e., industry-level factors), (2) the internal organization (i.e., firm-level factors), and (3) managerial characteristics (i.e., individual-level factors). Recently, a fourth category, national institutions (i.e., country-level factors), was added to the managerial discretion model. While the managerial discretion literature has typically focused on upper echelons, scholars are increasing their examination of mid-level managers’ discretion since many of the construct’s enabling and constraining factors are also relevant for managers who are subordinate to senior executives. The potential for issue selling and strategic planning activities by mid-level managers to influence executives’ perceived discretion is an example of phenomena studied by scholars attempting to improve our understanding of discretion afforded to mid-level managers.

Investigating the effects of logistics management on organizational performance: New evidence from the manufacturing industry

“…According to strategic choice theory, decisions made by top management have an impact on organizational performance as well as how internal and external organizations interact (Wangrow & Schloemer, 2019). In order to increase organizational performance levels, the idea underlies the significance of key management decisions, according to Sinaga, Nurfarina, Iskandar, Mozammel, and Rosita (2019).…”

Managerial discretion and structures in organizations: The case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

“…According to Wangrow & Schloemer [7] , though generally viewed in the management literature as an opportunity for executives to positively affect performance and increase value, the literature in finance and economics argues that managerial discretion represents a cost to shareholders from potential opportunism or other self-serving behaviors.…”

“…Managerial discretion has a great link with strategic direction and thereby to structure of an organization, to this extent managerial discretion is shaped by internal organizational factors such as powerful factions inside the firm, firm demographics, and resource availability [7] . Besides, as Murugan 2005 [13] states the major types of organization structures are, line organization, functional organization, line and staff organization, project organization and matrix organization.…”