1985
DOI: 10.2307/256200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time Series Analysis of the Effects of Merit Pay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, however, the underlying foundation of expectancy theory failed to materialize. Some researchers found that respondents perceived little relationship between performance and compensation (Daley, 1987), that few believed higher pay would materialize (Pearce, Stevenson, and Perry, 1985), and that financial incentives were too small to be valued (Heinrich, 2007). Other researchers found that a lack of financial motivation existed in pay-for-performance systems (Dowling and Richardson, 1997) and that distaste existed among employees for the divisive side effects among employees that merit pay could produce (Marsden, 2004).…”
Section: Employee Perceptions On Performance-based Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, however, the underlying foundation of expectancy theory failed to materialize. Some researchers found that respondents perceived little relationship between performance and compensation (Daley, 1987), that few believed higher pay would materialize (Pearce, Stevenson, and Perry, 1985), and that financial incentives were too small to be valued (Heinrich, 2007). Other researchers found that a lack of financial motivation existed in pay-for-performance systems (Dowling and Richardson, 1997) and that distaste existed among employees for the divisive side effects among employees that merit pay could produce (Marsden, 2004).…”
Section: Employee Perceptions On Performance-based Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous analyses show that civil servants and public-sector employees are not comfortable with NPHRM (Light 2002;Soni 2004;Farnham 2003). Performance-related pay has also shown its limits in many public (Pearce et al 1985;Marsden and Richardson 1994;Eberts et al 2002) and private (Igalens and Roussel 1999) contexts. The modernization of HRM is increasingly calling into question the traditional fundamental values of public organizationsequality, integrity, continuity, caution and neutrality -and proposing new values, such as efficiency, flexibility, innovation, risk and change, which are often contrary to those traditional values.…”
Section: The New Public Hrmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the lessons learned from applying BPR methodologies, tools, and techniques in the private sector may not be transferable without adaptation to the public sector. At the very least, these differences should require modification of many managerial prescriptions, typically based on results from the private sector [9,60]. Hence, research is needed to determine whether public organizations face similar or unique issues in successful BPR implementation.…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 99%