2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managerial commitment to the status quo and corporate divestiture: Can power motivate openness to change?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result showed that employee openness and resistance to change partially mediate the relationship between technological turbulence and resilience. The findings support the previous argument that openness to change encourages employee productivity and performance, whereas resistance to change decelerates employees’ intention to respond to turbulent environments (Ariza-Montes et al , 2017; Chiu et al , 2020; Dai et al , 2020; Hon et al , 2014). The available literature highlighted the importance of employee resilience to cope with TT.…”
Section: Conclusion and Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The result showed that employee openness and resistance to change partially mediate the relationship between technological turbulence and resilience. The findings support the previous argument that openness to change encourages employee productivity and performance, whereas resistance to change decelerates employees’ intention to respond to turbulent environments (Ariza-Montes et al , 2017; Chiu et al , 2020; Dai et al , 2020; Hon et al , 2014). The available literature highlighted the importance of employee resilience to cope with TT.…”
Section: Conclusion and Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We suggest that the effects of these different sources of CEO power may differ as the amount and character of the interactions between CEOs and stakeholders involved varies across the four distinguished sources (cf. Chiu et al, 2020; Park & Tzabbar, 2016). The unexpected outcomes regarding ownership power and prestige power might indicate that, in general, CEOs with high scores on these two sources of power are predominantly concerned with their own ownership or with the company’s reputation in the specific field than with broader societal values (i.e., employee, environmental, and social matters; Mishra & Modi, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we chose single proxy variables to reflect each source of CEO power. Following Chiu et al’s (Chiu et al, 2020) study, structural power was measured by CEO duality and coded as 1 for a combined CEO and board chair and 0 for a separate CEO and board chair. Ownership power was measured by CEO equity ownership , referring to a percentage of the number of shares owned by a CEO to the total shares of a firm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu et al, 2021). Kekuatan pemilik berfungsi sebagai alat strategis yang mampu mengurangi status quo di masa-masa krisis (Chiu et al, 2020). Adanya kontak antara manajemen dan pemilik juga dapat dijadikan dasar sebagai elemen yang bisa mempengaruhi keputusan manajemen dalam kondisi financial distress (He et al, 2021;Mangena et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified