2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1024-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis

Abstract: An uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem together with or without onlay strut allografts provides a good fracture stability that promotes fracture healing and offers a successful solution for the management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients had achieved fracture union by the final follow-up, and the length of femoral stem fixation beyond the distal end of the fracture was greater than 4 cm, which matched well with the femur. The patients in our study achieved better clinical outcomes compared to those in previous studies, 11,[33][34][35][36][37] such as Harris Hip score ( Table 5). Further studies with larger sample sizes will be required to determine whether this method will be effective for routine treatment of Vancouver type B2 PFFs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All patients had achieved fracture union by the final follow-up, and the length of femoral stem fixation beyond the distal end of the fracture was greater than 4 cm, which matched well with the femur. The patients in our study achieved better clinical outcomes compared to those in previous studies, 11,[33][34][35][36][37] such as Harris Hip score ( Table 5). Further studies with larger sample sizes will be required to determine whether this method will be effective for routine treatment of Vancouver type B2 PFFs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Our study involves longer follow-up (102 + 24.5 months) than most previous studies, which followed up for 14.5-60 months. 11,[33][34][35][36][37] Nevertheless, our study still has several limitations. First, the sample is relatively small, so statistical power is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…33,34 Stem subsidence is a concern in femoral revision arthroplasty 30,31 and uncontrolled subsidence has been regarded as a major cause for failure of uncemented revision stems. 35,36 Stem subsidence has been reported with a variety of implant designs, such as monoblock fluted tapered stems, 37,38 extensively porous-coated cylindrical stems, 39,40 and modular fluted tapered stems. 16,41,42 Subsidence of the Restoration modular fluted tapered stem has been reported to occur in 3.6-100% of the cases 29,30 ; such heterogeneity in subsidence rates may be related to the variability of the severity of preoperative bone defects and criteria used to define subsidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%