Management of the latex hypersensitive patient in the endodontic office

Kleier, Donald J.; Shibilski, Kelly

doi:10.1016/s0099-2399(99)80307-0

Cited by 19 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This result may suggest that more attention must be directed towards the possibility of latex allergy prior to application of the rubber dam considering some cases published [25, 26]. On the other hand, students from the private school indicated that they received a better education in terms of rubber dam with a statistical significance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Evaluation of Senior Dental Students’ General Attitude towards the Use of Rubber Dam: A Survey among Two Dental Schools

Tanalp

Kayataş

Can

et al. 2014

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the general attitude of senior dental students towards rubber dam use, specifically focusing on endodontic practices prior to starting to serve community. Questionnaires were distributed to senior year students of a private school and a state school in Istanbul. Questions were asked about areas where the students used rubber dam, its advantages and difficulties, and whether they agreed or disagreed with some aspects of the rubber dam. The private school students rated isolation whereas those of the state school selected prevention of aspiration which the top advantage rubber dam provides. Students of the state school agreed with the opinion that isolation cannot be achieved without rubber dam and it extended the procedure with a significantly higher ratio compared to the private school. Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the perceptions of dental students on rubber dam needs to be improved and strategies should be developed so that this valuable adjunct will comprise one of the indispensable elements of dental care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Evaluation of Senior Dental Students’ General Attitude towards the Use of Rubber Dam: A Survey among Two Dental Schools

Tanalp

Kayataş

Can

et al. 2014

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1984). Alternatives to using rubber dam have been reported for patients allergic to latex (Patterson 1989, Kleier & Shibilski 1999, Kosti & Lambrianidis 2002). Given the bacterial origin of periradicular lesions (Kakehashi et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accidental ingestion and aspiration of root canal instruments and other dental foreign bodies in a French population

Susini¹,

Pommel²,

Camps³

2007

Int Endodontic J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Adverse reactions in patients following the utilization of latex rubber dams have been reported by a number of authors , Kleier & Shibilski 1999, De Andrade et al 2000, Kosti & Lambrianidis 2002. Weesner (1997) reported that there was little information in the literature on the extent of latex allergy amongst dental personnel.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delayed type allergic reaction following the use of nonlatex rubber dam during endodontic treatment

Sunay¹,

Tanalp²,

Güler

et al. 2006

Int Endodontic J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Management of the latex hypersensitive patient in the endodontic office

Cited by 19 publications

References 6 publications

Evaluation of Senior Dental Students’ General Attitude towards the Use of Rubber Dam: A Survey among Two Dental Schools

Evaluation of Senior Dental Students’ General Attitude towards the Use of Rubber Dam: A Survey among Two Dental Schools

Accidental ingestion and aspiration of root canal instruments and other dental foreign bodies in a French population

Delayed type allergic reaction following the use of nonlatex rubber dam during endodontic treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About