2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Talar Component Subsidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Talar component subsidence is always associated with uneven distribution of load, which causes a shift of the load-bearing axis, further bone erosion, and eventual prosthesis failure. 59 Symptomatic talar component subsidence in the setting of a failed TAA can be treated with complete revision or isolated talar component revision if the tibial component is stable. Revision in these scenarios is complicated further by additional bone loss with removal of the talar component, debridement of necrotic bone, and resection of the talus to a flat platform sufficient to achieve stability with the revision component.…”
Section: Management and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Talar component subsidence is always associated with uneven distribution of load, which causes a shift of the load-bearing axis, further bone erosion, and eventual prosthesis failure. 59 Symptomatic talar component subsidence in the setting of a failed TAA can be treated with complete revision or isolated talar component revision if the tibial component is stable. Revision in these scenarios is complicated further by additional bone loss with removal of the talar component, debridement of necrotic bone, and resection of the talus to a flat platform sufficient to achieve stability with the revision component.…”
Section: Management and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,18,21 Differentiating between normal component settling, migration, subsidence, and component collapse can be challenging. 4,7,15,32 Although available studies frequently report on rates of subsidence, very few have defined how subsidence is measured. 1,2,6,11,20,29 In addition, although other studies have described the measurements used to define component migration, they have relied on implant-specific landmarks that may not be transferable to all cases or implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although pathologic subsidence is associated with component loosening, instability, and failure, “stable subsidence,” where vertical migration of the component occurs more than would be expected with simple physiological settling but not to the point of destabilizing the component, may also occur. 1,32,34 By choosing a conservative, yet reproducible, definition of subsidence, we may have combined patients with stable and unstable subsidence, and this could potentially explain the disparity between our rate of subsidence and the failure rate. Lending support to this is the review by Glazebrook et al, who in their classification of TAA complications, classified subsidence as a medium-grade complication leading to failure less than 50% of the time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The painful TAR with loosening or subsidence can be treated with isolated tibial or talar component revision if the other component remains stable or complete revision if there is loss of fixation around both components (Figure 6). 67 It is critical to assess the amount of residual bone stock around each component of the implant, as structural support is vital to obtaining a stable revision construct. Tibial component revision requires a healthy cancellous bone base that comprises at least 50% of the tibial articular surface, as well as medial and lateral structural support, and maintenance of both malleoli.…”
Section: Is There Subsidence/loosening?mentioning
confidence: 99%