2018
DOI: 10.1044/persp3.sig13.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Swallowing in Adults Undergoing Laryngotracheal Resection and Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing studies on dysphagia as a primary outcome of LTS and airway reconstruction have explored data such as duration of tube feeding post-reconstruction [ 16 ] and a clinician-rated scale to assess changes in swallowing function before and after surgery [ 11 ]. The clinical presentation and best practice management of dysphagia in this population has been reported in both the adult and paediatric literature [ 17 , 18 ]. There are no adult studies that have focussed on the biomechanical mechanism of dysphagia as a result of LTS or airway surgeries, however clinical experience shows that for the majority of patients significant dysphagia is short-term, and is related to a combination of reduced swallow efficiency and safety [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies on dysphagia as a primary outcome of LTS and airway reconstruction have explored data such as duration of tube feeding post-reconstruction [ 16 ] and a clinician-rated scale to assess changes in swallowing function before and after surgery [ 11 ]. The clinical presentation and best practice management of dysphagia in this population has been reported in both the adult and paediatric literature [ 17 , 18 ]. There are no adult studies that have focussed on the biomechanical mechanism of dysphagia as a result of LTS or airway surgeries, however clinical experience shows that for the majority of patients significant dysphagia is short-term, and is related to a combination of reduced swallow efficiency and safety [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of consensus has resulted in considerable variation in practice with respect to nutritional management of the newly reconstructed airway, specifically the duration of tube feeding, timing and nature of swallow assessment and length of hospital stay. 6 A clear understanding of preoperative swallow status based upon instrumental evaluation (ie VFS and Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallow, [FEES]) with validated scoring systems may support appropriate patient selection and preparation for airway reconstruction, as well as helping to predict the likely degree and duration of postoperative dysphagia. This is of critical importance because it is recognised that underlying aspiration pre-disposes to reconstruction failure and may deteriorate with surgery such that significant chronic lung damage ensues.…”
Section: Instrumental Swallow Assessment Around the Time Of Airway Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 If an oesophageal issue is suspected or the degree of aspiration on FEES is in doubt, a VFS may be performed if it is likely to change management. The treatment of any identified dysphagia includes therapeutic manoeuvres, dietary modifications, interim tube feeding and swallowing rehabilitation exercises as part of a regular review process to ensure progression, 6 with avoidance of nil by mouth status wherever possible. Such an approach is supported by our belief that oral intake and swallow rehabilitation are the major independent (and interrelated) factors influencing long-term swallowing outcomes in a mobile, independent and otherwise healthy patient cohort, whilst excessive caution risks further deterioration in function.…”
Section: Patient Evaluation and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations