2022
DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Status Epilepticus, Refractory Status Epilepticus, and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Status epilepticus is a serious condition caused by disorders and diseases that affect the central nervous system. In status epilepticus, hypersynchronous epileptic activity lasts longer than the usual duration of isolated self-limited seizures (time t1), which causes neuronal damage or alteration of neuronal networks at a certain time point (time t2), depending on the type of and duration of status epilepticus. The successful management of status epilepticus includes both the early terminat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
(439 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), and data on the presence and extension of slow and/or epileptic activity were gathered according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's standardized critical care EEG terminology. 30 Other data collection included use of antiseizure medications (ASMs), presence and type of status epilepticus (SE), 31,32 and refractory epilepsy. 33…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and data on the presence and extension of slow and/or epileptic activity were gathered according to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's standardized critical care EEG terminology. 30 Other data collection included use of antiseizure medications (ASMs), presence and type of status epilepticus (SE), 31,32 and refractory epilepsy. 33…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were categorized into patients receiving anesthetics as recommended third‐line treatment, 2–4 patients treated with anesthetics earlier than third‐line (i.e., as first‐ or second‐line) treatment, and patients in whom anesthesia was delayed (i.e., as fourth‐ or fifth‐line treatment). Univariable comparisons of these three groups were performed by the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and by the χ 2 test or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 International treatment guidelines recommend antiseizure treatment starting with benzodiazepines as first-line medication, followed by second-line antiseizure medication, such as levetiracetam, valproic acid, or phenytoin. [2][3][4] When SE is refractory to first-and second-line antiseizure drugs, treatment escalation with the induction of an artificial coma by continuously administered intravenous anesthetic drugs is recommended for 24-48 h with the aim of terminating seizures. [2][3][4] Although, at first glance, these recommendations seem justified, high-quality studies regarding the efficacy and tolerability of anesthesia at different stages of SE are scarce 5 and the induction of artificial coma has been associated with adverse effects, [6][7][8][9][10] complications during the course of SE 10,11 and the postictal phase, 12 and unfavorable outcomes in some studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations