2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2486859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients with Negative Initial Digital Subtraction Angiogram Findings: Conservative or Aggressive?

Abstract: Background. The ideal management of SAH patients with negative initial DSA findings remains unresolved. Objective. (i) To present risk factors, clinical courses, and outcomes in different types of SAH patients with negative DSA findings; (ii) to explore the differences of basal vein between aSAH patients and NASAH patients; and (iii) to evaluate the value of repeated DSA for these patients. Methods. All SAH patients with negative initial DSA findings between 2013 and 2015 in our hospital were enrolled and were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients were divided into the PM-SAH (n = 45 patients) and the nPM-SAH groups (n = 33) based on the bleeding pattern on the initial CT scan. 9,11 All patients underwent cranial and spinal MRI for the recognition of possible underlying causes. If a vascular lesion was suspected, additional spinal DSA was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The patients were divided into the PM-SAH (n = 45 patients) and the nPM-SAH groups (n = 33) based on the bleeding pattern on the initial CT scan. 9,11 All patients underwent cranial and spinal MRI for the recognition of possible underlying causes. If a vascular lesion was suspected, additional spinal DSA was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes were evaluated using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at the time of discharge. 5,9 We considered GOS = 4 to 5 as a favorable outcome and GOS = 1 to 3 as unfavorable outcomes. 12…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations