2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of spent shea waste: An instrumental characterization and valorization in clay bricks construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical analysis and determination of exact waste materials compositions are key factors in designing a management strategy in terms of considering recycling, reuse, transformations and final disposal (Aparcana, 2017; Park, 2014). In the case of ISW, manufacturing technology and extent of reuse and recycling directly affect the compositions of generated waste materials (Adazabra et al, 2017; Thomanetz, 2012). As shown in Figure 4, the major components of waste materials generated in the Savojbolagh industrial zone were as follows: plastic (28% w), which was comprised of 1.81 t d -1 ; different types of plastic, paper and cardboard (22% w), which was comprised of 1.45 t d -1 ; and metals (15% w), which was consisted of 1.329 t d -1 different ferrous and non-ferrous metals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical analysis and determination of exact waste materials compositions are key factors in designing a management strategy in terms of considering recycling, reuse, transformations and final disposal (Aparcana, 2017; Park, 2014). In the case of ISW, manufacturing technology and extent of reuse and recycling directly affect the compositions of generated waste materials (Adazabra et al, 2017; Thomanetz, 2012). As shown in Figure 4, the major components of waste materials generated in the Savojbolagh industrial zone were as follows: plastic (28% w), which was comprised of 1.81 t d -1 ; different types of plastic, paper and cardboard (22% w), which was comprised of 1.45 t d -1 ; and metals (15% w), which was consisted of 1.329 t d -1 different ferrous and non-ferrous metals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, agricultural biomass additives such as straw improve the properties of mud bricks [1].Consequently, studying these properties is a first step in evaluating the impact of the material not only on energy consumption, but also on indoor comfort [3]. The use of organic additives has increased worldwide, mainly due to their availability and also for their thermal, mechanical and environmental impact [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].As a result, the incorporation of biomass additives into clay bricks can reduce thermal conductivity and enhance compressive strengths. In our case, we used the argan shells as additives to the clay blocks; Argan trees are located mainly in the sous massa region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, incorporating waste as building material is getting importance and benefiting construction sector by improving the functional properties. Recycling of various waste materials like corn cub, rice husk, wine waste, glass powder, marble powder, shea waste, fly ash, ciggerate buds, granite waste, sugarcane baggage [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] were utilised in manufacturing of bricks. Each additive has its own process and functional advantages like light weight, increased water absorption and energy efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%