2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of slaughter houses in northern Nigeria and the safety of meat produced for human consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public health (zoonotic) risk associated with the respondents' awareness and practices of bTB found in this study had agreed with the report of Cadmus and Adesokan [ 8 ] who reported an economic loss of N13, 871,014/annum with associated public health implications due to tuberculosis (7.95%) as major reasons for condemnations in some abattoirs in Western Nigeria. This also agreed with the report of Cadmus et al [ 21 ] and Bello et al [ 22 ], on management of slaughter houses in Northern Nigeria, who reported that none of the major abattoirs in Northern Nigeria met the minimum hygienic standard of operation as recommended by the Codex Alimentarius and they could not have supported the production of safe meat and meat products for human consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Public health (zoonotic) risk associated with the respondents' awareness and practices of bTB found in this study had agreed with the report of Cadmus and Adesokan [ 8 ] who reported an economic loss of N13, 871,014/annum with associated public health implications due to tuberculosis (7.95%) as major reasons for condemnations in some abattoirs in Western Nigeria. This also agreed with the report of Cadmus et al [ 21 ] and Bello et al [ 22 ], on management of slaughter houses in Northern Nigeria, who reported that none of the major abattoirs in Northern Nigeria met the minimum hygienic standard of operation as recommended by the Codex Alimentarius and they could not have supported the production of safe meat and meat products for human consumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The preponderance of the Staphylococcus contaminants in beef widely consumed in Nigeria [ 30 ] is disheartening in view of the toxigenic and antimicrobial resistance profiles of the contaminants. High rate of contamination of beef could be attributed to unwholesome slaughter or beef processing practices in some slaughterhouses in the study area [ 31 , 32 ]. The practice of flaying or evisceration of cattle carcass on bare floor or immersion of processed meat in water of unproven microbial quality, to make it appear bigger, predisposes meat to Staphylococcus contamination [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries, animals are commonly slaughtered and dressed under unhygienic conditions and this further compromises the microbiological quality and safety of the meat obtained from the animals [6,7]. The presence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in animal faeces provides the potential for these organisms to enter the food chain via faecal contamination of milk, contamination of meat with intestinal contents during slaughter or contamination of fruit and vegetables by contact with contaminated manure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%