2010
DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e3283398237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of posttransplant hepatitis C infection

Abstract: With modified novel IMS protocols, careful donor selection, and AVT prior to significant damage to the allograft we can improve the outcome of posttransplant hepatitis C infection. Albeit there are no available data on new antiviral agents, STAT-Cs will have a significant impact in this setting in the near future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These programs were life-saving for LT patients, many of whom would have died without these early access programs, given the rapid progression from decompensated to death seen in LT patients with recurrent decompensated cirrhosis. [3,5,31,43] ]. As in the nontransplant setting, treatment with protease inhibitor based regimens is not recommended because of safety concerns.…”
Section: Posttransplant Hepatitis C Virus Treatment In Decompensated mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These programs were life-saving for LT patients, many of whom would have died without these early access programs, given the rapid progression from decompensated to death seen in LT patients with recurrent decompensated cirrhosis. [3,5,31,43] ]. As in the nontransplant setting, treatment with protease inhibitor based regimens is not recommended because of safety concerns.…”
Section: Posttransplant Hepatitis C Virus Treatment In Decompensated mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior cohort studies from the interferon-based treatment era established that viral eradication with HCV therapy improved post-LT survival, but the achievement of a sustained virological response (SVR) was challenging because of limited efficacy and poor tolerability [5]. Thus, the pre-and post-LT populations were viewed as two of the most difficult-to-treat groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Possible underlying mechanisms include HIV-mediated immune activation and dys-regulation, inadequate immunosuppression due to DDIs between ART medications and immunosuppressants, and crossreactivity with subsequent hepatocellular injury from memory alloreactive T cells generated from exposure to prior infections such as cytomegalovirus [7,29]. Importantly, in the setting of HCV infection, treatment of acute rejection has been associated with progression of fibrosis and poorer graft and patient survival [30,31]. …”
Section: Liver Transplantation Outcomes In Hiv-infected Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 50% of non-transplant patients who are difficult to treat because of the presence of factors predicting a lack of response have been shown to experience a greater sustained viral response (Aymant et, 2010). In transplanted patients, the increase in efficacy, applicability and tolerance, and the possible interactions with other drugs are as yet unknown and more studies are still required.…”
Section: New Therapies For Hcvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases management should be personalized, and consideration given to such factors as renal function, concomitant diabetes, a prior history of rejection and genotype (Aymant et al, 2010).…”
Section: Late Post-transplant Antiviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%