“…With the notable exception of healthcare waste management (25% ± 6.8 percentage points), “supporting” activities are also understudied. The literature on healthcare waste management includes, but is not limited to, reviews of legal and regulatory requirements (Takatsuki, ; Haylamicheal & Desalegne, ; Botelho, ), surveys and case studies of healthcare waste management attitudes and practices (Idowu, Alo, Atherton, & Al Khaddar, ; Ul Rahman, Hameed, Shahjehan, Ayyaz, & Kha et al., ; Askarian, Vakili, & Kabir, ; Aseweh Abor & Bouwer, ; Saad, ; Thiel, Duncan, & Woods, ; Jovanović, Manojlović, Jovanović, Matić, & Đonović, ; Gupta et al., ), waste audits (Patwary et al., ; Voudrias, Goudakou, Kermenidou, & Softa, ; Suwannee, ; Komilis, Brat, Makary, ; Saad, ; Majid & Umrani, ; Patil & Pokhrel, ), and toxicological studies of healthcare wastes (Gupta, Mathur, Bhatnagar, Nagar, & Srivastava, ). The evident focus on waste management probably reflects the visibility of this issue, the large volumes of waste generated in healthcare services (e.g., the US healthcare sector generates about 1.7 million tons of solid waste annually [United States Environmental Protection Agency, ]), and the complex legal and regulatory aspects related to medical waste.…”