2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1395-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure

Abstract: BackgroundCaesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a late serious complication of caesarean section. The incidence of CSP has increased worldwide in recent years. Early diagnosis and prompt therapy are crucial to avoid catastrophic complications. There are various strategies for CSP treatment, but there is no consensus on the best management for CSP. Dilation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopy are common and effective treatments with their advantages and disadvantages. No in-depth study of the clinical effects of h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A difference of just a couple of weeks (for example, 8–10 weeks compared with 5–7 weeks) increases the complexity of a termination, usually necessitating an operating suite, an anesthesiologist and an expert gynecologic surgeon. It is clearly documented in the literature that termination of CSP at or after 9 weeks decreases the success rate of initial treatment and calls for more involved procedures, such as hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, uterine artery embolization, and/or gravid hysterectomy, all of which by their very nature carry higher risk for complications and even loss of fertility (in cases of hysterectomy).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A difference of just a couple of weeks (for example, 8–10 weeks compared with 5–7 weeks) increases the complexity of a termination, usually necessitating an operating suite, an anesthesiologist and an expert gynecologic surgeon. It is clearly documented in the literature that termination of CSP at or after 9 weeks decreases the success rate of initial treatment and calls for more involved procedures, such as hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, uterine artery embolization, and/or gravid hysterectomy, all of which by their very nature carry higher risk for complications and even loss of fertility (in cases of hysterectomy).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cesarean scar pregnancy occurs due to implantation of the gestational sac into a myometrial defect at the site of previous uterine incision. 2,3 It's a very rare form of ectopic pregnancy, with an estimated incidence ranging from 1/1800 to 1/2500 of all pregnancies. 4 The first case of CSP was described in 1978, and until 2001 only 19 cases were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In a study published in 2017, in a tertiary hospital in the School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, People's Republic of China, a total of 1348 women were diagnosed during the study period (between March 2011 and September 2014). 3 This dramatic increase in prevalence of CSP is in part due to higher rates of CS, but it's also attributable to better ultrasound diagnosis on basis of high index of suspicion and clinical awareness. Some cases may be asymptomatic, while others may present with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding or hemodynamic instability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska pothesized that while D/C procedure alone is inadequate in the treatment of CSP, D/C plus systemic MTX therapy may be useful. Since the recurrent CSP is ubiquitous after the D/C procedure, a recent trial has shown that the operative hysteroscopy is useful in such cases [22].…”
Section: Figure-4: Recurrent Csp Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%