2001
DOI: 10.1192/apt.7.2.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of people with challenging behaviour

Abstract: The term ‘challenging behaviour’ was introduced in North America in the 1980s, and was originally used to describe problematic behaviours in people with ‘mental retardation’ (learning disabilities). Challenging behaviour can, however, occur across the intellectual spectrum, being particularly prevalent in populations with psychiatric disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are good‐quality studies showing promise of efficacy (outcome studies by Beail & Warden ; Beail ), but, expert opinion remains that further research is needed on the outcomes of psychoanalytically based psychotherapies for challenging behaviour (Xeniditis et al . ; Willner ; RCP/BPS/RCSLT ). Although no such studies were included in the Matrix at levels A or B, in this review the work of Beail () and Prout & Nowak‐Drabik () are both included at level C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are good‐quality studies showing promise of efficacy (outcome studies by Beail & Warden ; Beail ), but, expert opinion remains that further research is needed on the outcomes of psychoanalytically based psychotherapies for challenging behaviour (Xeniditis et al . ; Willner ; RCP/BPS/RCSLT ). Although no such studies were included in the Matrix at levels A or B, in this review the work of Beail () and Prout & Nowak‐Drabik () are both included at level C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For psychoanalytically based psychotherapies there is evidence that psychodynamic approaches can be effective in the reduction of psychological distress and interpersonal problems associated with challenging behaviour, particularly in people with milder ID (RCP/BPS/RCSLT 2007). There are good-quality studies showing promise of efficacy (outcome studies by Beail & Warden 1996;Beail 1998), but, expert opinion remains that further research is needed on the outcomes of psychoanalytically based psychotherapies for challenging behaviour (Xeniditis et al 2001;Willner 2005; RCP/ BPS/ RCSLT 2007). Although no such studies were included in the Matrix at levels A or B, in this review the work of Beail (1998) and Prout & Nowak-Drabik (2003) are both included at level C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching staff were also significantly likely to define challenging behaviour in terms of its function. Understanding the function of a behaviour for an individual is central to developing an appropriate intervention, however, identifying the function without undertaking a formal functional analysis can be problematic, as it may result in an inaccurate function being identified (Sturmey 1996; Xeniditis et al. 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In formulating management strategies for challenging behaviour, Xenitidis et al (2001) recommended a systematic approach of identification of target behaviour, quantitative measurement of target behaviour, generation of hypotheses (medical, psychological and social) about the genesis and maintenance of the behaviour, delivery of therapeutic intervention, evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention and generation and testing of alternative hypotheses. Such approach should form the basis of risk management.…”
Section: Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%