2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that patients must wait at their local hospital before being transported to the PCI centre. These patients therefore experience more complex clinical pathways and are discharged sooner from hospital as compared to STEMI patients [41]. This is also consistent with the finding that patients who stayed in hospital for a longer period or were transported to another hospital before discharge experienced greater continuity of care.…”
Section: Health Service Factors Associated With Perceived Continuity supporting
confidence: 79%
“…This means that patients must wait at their local hospital before being transported to the PCI centre. These patients therefore experience more complex clinical pathways and are discharged sooner from hospital as compared to STEMI patients [41]. This is also consistent with the finding that patients who stayed in hospital for a longer period or were transported to another hospital before discharge experienced greater continuity of care.…”
Section: Health Service Factors Associated With Perceived Continuity supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In CAD treatment, the adoption of PCI and drug‐eluting stents presents great effect on unchoking the stenosis of coronary artery, preventing vessel wall recoil, and inhibiting neointimal growth of the targeted lesion, while the treatment efficacy has been frequently reported to be attenuated by occurrence of RASP and restenosis, which becomes one of the major clinical challenges for CAD treatment . Although the exact mechanism of RASP in CAD patients is unclear, it is currently accepted that rupture of plaques and the subsequent injury response facilitate the accretion of the vascular wall and contribute to RASP .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, MI treatment can only relieve the symptoms but cannot solve the problem of myocardial cell loss from the root. 3) As a result, the incidence and mortality of heart failure after MI continue to rise. 4) Studies have confirmed that cardiomyocyte apoptosis is an important cause of ventricular remodeling, cardiac insufficiency, and arrhythmia after MI, 5,6) and myocardial angiogenesis is a key process for ventricular remodeling after MI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%