2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12262-011-0386-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Pancreaticoduodenal Injuries

Abstract: The nature of the pancreatic or duodenal injury itself influences mortality, and is co-dependent on the presence of multiple other injuries, which account for most of the early mortality. Intra-abdominal sepsis leading to multiple organ failure accounts for most of the late deaths, indicating the importance of early haemodynamic stabilization, adequate debridement of devitalized tissue and wide drainage. Most duodenal injuries can be adequately managed with primary repair or resection and anastomosis. The pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this could be considered a late timing since it might correspond to a high peritoneal inflammatory reaction after a biliary peritonitis, it has been reported that in abdominal sepsis caused by secondary peritonitis, the acute phase proteins synthesis stimulated by cytokines recover to normal values only after day 12 of the post-operative period [31]. The fact that, in both cases, there were no inaccessible exsanguinant lesions involving both the retropancreatic portal nor the superior mesenteric vein, allowed this 15-day delay between the two stages of pancreatoduodenectomy; under those circumstances, that period would have been considered excessive [32]. Moreover, there is no recommendation in literature concerning the timing of the definitive procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this could be considered a late timing since it might correspond to a high peritoneal inflammatory reaction after a biliary peritonitis, it has been reported that in abdominal sepsis caused by secondary peritonitis, the acute phase proteins synthesis stimulated by cytokines recover to normal values only after day 12 of the post-operative period [31]. The fact that, in both cases, there were no inaccessible exsanguinant lesions involving both the retropancreatic portal nor the superior mesenteric vein, allowed this 15-day delay between the two stages of pancreatoduodenectomy; under those circumstances, that period would have been considered excessive [32]. Moreover, there is no recommendation in literature concerning the timing of the definitive procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pancreaticoduodenal trauma is rare but has a significant morbidity (36%–60%) and mortality (18%–23%). [4] The outcome depends on early diagnosis, which is essentially based on a high index of suspicion. Management of pancreaticoduodenal trauma and isolated PDAH is problematic due to the complex anatomical relations of the duodenum, pancreas, biliary tract, and major vessels, and difficulties in the diagnosis and determination of the treatment strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, surgical treatment is associated with significant morbidity because of surgery-related complications. [4] Therefore, in the case of isolated PDAH without any major organ or intestinal injury, TAE should be considered as the first treatment approach. However, TAE for the pancreaticoduodenal artery (PDA) is technically challenging and sometimes impossible as it is difficult to predict the origin and to localize the artery on angiography and embolize the involved artery completely due to the abundant vascular supply and multiple potential collateral channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical triad of upper abdominal pain, leukocytosis and raised amylase may not always be evident during the first 24 hours or even later in pancreaticoduodenal injuries 2 . After initial investigation following general principles of Advanced trauma life support (ATLS), patients should undergo FAST scan and CECT although both of these tests have low sensitivity of 40% to 50% for pancreatic injury 4,5 . In such cases, CECT abdomen may show hard signs such as parenchymal lacerations and soft signs like peripancreatic fluid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%