2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Overactive Bladder With OnabotulinumtoxinA: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, uncomplicated mild urinary tract infections and transient hematuria were seen in 5 (6.25%) patients each in the 2nd postoperative week. In another systematic review and meta‐analysis by Ramos et al, urinary retention was defined as a PVR over 200 mL and was higher in the 100 U onaBoNT‐A injection group than in the placebo group (relative risk: 11.49; 95%CI: 4.6‐28.70; P = 0.00001) . In the current study, CIC was initiated in three patients due to a higher PVR and was discontinued at the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th postoperative weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the present study, uncomplicated mild urinary tract infections and transient hematuria were seen in 5 (6.25%) patients each in the 2nd postoperative week. In another systematic review and meta‐analysis by Ramos et al, urinary retention was defined as a PVR over 200 mL and was higher in the 100 U onaBoNT‐A injection group than in the placebo group (relative risk: 11.49; 95%CI: 4.6‐28.70; P = 0.00001) . In the current study, CIC was initiated in three patients due to a higher PVR and was discontinued at the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th postoperative weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This study also utilized robust data from two large randomized trials to develop models to predict outcomes after two different doses of BoNT‐A allowing prediction of outcomes after both 100 and 200 units. Thus far in multiple systematic reviews and meta‐analyses there has been insufficient evidence to determine an optimal starting dose for BoNT‐A 7,9,31–33 . It is possible that the increase risk of adverse events—elevated PVR and UTI—may modulate the effect of 200 units when compared to 100 units 34–36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far in multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses there has been insufficient evidence to determine an optimal starting dose for BoNT-A. 7,9,[31][32][33] It is possible that the increase risk of adverse events-elevated PVR and UTImay modulate the effect of 200 units when compared to 21 where apparent and bias-corrected curves are smoothed using loess. The bias-corrected curves are adjusted for optimism using bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions to correct for overfitting.…”
Section: T a B L E 2 Coefficients For The Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncomplicated UTI was the most common adverse event; a 5.4% rate of urinary retention was observed 56 . A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised, placebo‐controlled studies supports the EMBARK findings 57 …”
Section: If Drug Therapy Fails What Is Next?mentioning
confidence: 73%