2008
DOI: 10.1159/000126822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Obesity in Adults: European Clinical Practice Guidelines

Abstract: The development of consensus guidelines for obesity is complex. It involves recommending both treatment interventions and interventions related to screening and prevention. With so many publications and claims, and with the awareness that success for the individual is short-lived, many find it difficult to know what action is appropriate in the management of obesity. Furthermore, the significant variation in existing service provision both within countries as well as across the regions of Europe makes a standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
270
1
30

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
270
1
30
Order By: Relevance
“…• Personal data: Age, gender Patients were divided into three classes, according to the body mass index (BMI): Normal weight (IMC = 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (IMC = 25.0-29.9 kg/m²) and obese (IMC ≥ 30 kg/m²), according to the current international standards [2][3][4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Personal data: Age, gender Patients were divided into three classes, according to the body mass index (BMI): Normal weight (IMC = 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), overweight (IMC = 25.0-29.9 kg/m²) and obese (IMC ≥ 30 kg/m²), according to the current international standards [2][3][4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres (kg/m 2 ). Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30·0 kg/m 2 and subcategories of obesity were defind as follows: class I as 30·0 ≤ BMI < 34·9 kg/m 2 ; class II as 35·0 ≤ BMI < 39·9 kg/m 2 ; and class III as BMI ≥ 40·0 kg/m 2 (26) . WC of ≥ 89 cm in men and ≥91 cm in women were considered as cut-off points for abdominal obesity, based on national cut-offs (27) ; although other WC cut-offs also exist for different Iraninan populations, we used the ones proposed by Delavari et al (27) since they are the only ones representative of the whole nation, with the largest sample size and are widely used in similar studies.…”
Section: Measurements and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These people are at an increased risk to suffer from cardiovascular disorders with hypertension (HTN) and heart failure (HF) being the most frequent. 2,3 The pathogenesis of obesity is multifactorial resulting from interaction of biological, social and environmental factors. 4 However, current investigations have elucidated some aspects of this pathogenesis which explain an association among a high body mass index, HTN and HF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%