1986
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.9.5.490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Obese Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Comparison of Advice Education With Group Management

Abstract: The purpose of our study was to compare the effect on diabetes control of group management with the advice-educational technique traditionally used in managing obese outpatients with poorly controlled non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to these two treatment programs, and 32 patients completed the 6-mo study. Initially, patients were seen for 1-h sessions at 1- and 2-wk intervals and later at 1-mo intervals. Patients were asked to do home blood glucose mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The care delivered to the control group also varied greatly, and improvements in GHb may be found in that group because of the Hawthorne effect, control group contamination, and unintended cointerventions. In several studies there were greater improvements in the control than the intervention group, leading to a net increase in ⌬I Ϫ ⌬C (32,48,68). Several meta-analyses have been previously published on this subject.…”
Section: Meta-regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The care delivered to the control group also varied greatly, and improvements in GHb may be found in that group because of the Hawthorne effect, control group contamination, and unintended cointerventions. In several studies there were greater improvements in the control than the intervention group, leading to a net increase in ⌬I Ϫ ⌬C (32,48,68). Several meta-analyses have been previously published on this subject.…”
Section: Meta-regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a study had several different intervention groups, we averaged GHb and variances within each study, weighted by the sample size (8,27,30,38,(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46). In several studies, GHb point estimates and CIs were not presented in numeric form, and they were estimated from graphs (28,30,47,48). If the SE was missing for the control or intervention groups at baseline or followup, then it was assumed to be the same as the value reported for the other group (27,29,30,42,43,49).…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies measuring changes in diabetes knowledge demonstrate improvement with education (Table 2) (26 -46), including those with follow-up of 6 -12 months after the last intervention contact (28 -30,36,40,43). Seven studies demonstrated improved knowledge for both the intervention and control groups (47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53), suggesting possible contamination due to the infeasibility of blinding participants. A number of studies demonstrated that regular reinforcement or repetition of the intervention seemed to improve knowledge levels at variable lengths of follow-up: Bloomgarden et al (34) (26,30,32,33,35,39,44,47,52,54 -56).…”
Section: Process Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,56,[72][73][74]80,81,87,88 It was unclear what approach was used in two studies. 57,63 Over half of the interventions lasted 0-5 months (n = 28), 47,53,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][67][68][69][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]85,86 12 interventions ranged between 6 and 11 months, 46,52,[54][55][56][57]66,70,84,90,91 six interventions were 12 months or longer 49,65,81,82,84,87,88 and in five cases the total programme duration was unclear. 48,…”
Section: Self-management Support Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical activity (n = 16), 49 47,53,58,59,62,66,70,71,79,[89][90][91] and the remainder used a mixed individual and group approach (n = 6). 49,56,[72][73][74]80,81,87,88 It was unclear what approach was used in two studies.…”
Section: Self-management Support Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%