2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.01.019
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma: Updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Guidelines 2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
393
1
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
(110 reference statements)
4
393
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Amongst the best results reported to date, OS and PFS at 10 years are 62 and 41%, with a long median follow-up of 8.8 years, 13,20,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] despite sub-optimal induction regimens by today's standards (VAD was administered to 82% of our patients). 38 The main factors explaining these favorable results are very low rates of acute GvHD and NRM. It is well recognized that grades II-IV acute GvHD is associated with deleterious outcome and lower PFS and OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 Amongst the best results reported to date, OS and PFS at 10 years are 62 and 41%, with a long median follow-up of 8.8 years, 13,20,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] despite sub-optimal induction regimens by today's standards (VAD was administered to 82% of our patients). 38 The main factors explaining these favorable results are very low rates of acute GvHD and NRM. It is well recognized that grades II-IV acute GvHD is associated with deleterious outcome and lower PFS and OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have worked to develop systems that use prognostic markers to stratify patients with MM into homogeneous survival subgroups 1, 6, 7, 8, 9. Risk stratification facilitates prognostication, allowing patients to be categorized as having lower risk (ie, longer OS) or higher risk (ie, shorter OS) disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Standard pretransplant conditioning consists of 200 mg/m 2 of melphalan (Mel200) based on increased tolerability and efficacy compared with other regimens. 5,6 Most studies evaluating Mel200 excluded patients with RI (42 mg/dL) owing to concerns of increased treatment-related morbidity and non-relapse mortality. There are widely conflicting clinical and pharmacokinetic data in this patient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%