2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of multiple myeloma: The changing landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide are changing therapeutic paradigms in patients with multiple myeloma (1, 2). Used as salvage therapy, these agents have been highly effective in increasing response rates, event-free survival and overall survival when standard therapies have failed (313).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide are changing therapeutic paradigms in patients with multiple myeloma (1, 2). Used as salvage therapy, these agents have been highly effective in increasing response rates, event-free survival and overall survival when standard therapies have failed (313).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel therapies include thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib, which have been studied extensively in a relapsed setting as single agents, in combination with dexamethasone, and in combination with cytotoxic agents or with each other 6. Salvage chemotherapy regimens such as vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) can also be an option for relapsed disease, though they have largely been replaced by novel agents in the front-line setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has resulted in higher response rates following induction therapy and auto-SCT. 2,3 Previous studies have determined that the optimal number of CD34 þ cells for a single auto-SCT is 4-6 Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg, with deleterious effects on engraftment observed once the SC dose falls below 2 Â 10 6 CD34 þ cells/kg. 4,5 G-CSF with or without chemotherapy is considered the standard approach for SC mobilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Despite these advances in SC collection strategies, it is estimated that about 5% of patients with MM fail to mobilize sufficient SCs for auto-SCT. 3 Risk factors associated with poor SC yield and mobilization failure include age, exposure to alkylating agents such as melphalan, extensive radiation therapy, widespread BM infiltration and mobilization regimens. [7][8][9][10][11][12] With the increasing use of novel agents in the upfront setting, several reports have emerged raising concerns regarding their impact on the ability to adequately collect SCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%