2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of interactions between endangered species using habitat restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other antagonistic interactions between protected species can be diffused by human intervention. For example, Gumm et al (2011) describe recent interactions between two endangered fish species; as habitat became more restricted, one began to prey on the eggs of the other, contributing to its decline. By expanding and restoring breeding habitats, managers were able to decrease egg predation rates and populations rebounded (Gumm et al 2011).…”
Section: Complications Of Joint Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other antagonistic interactions between protected species can be diffused by human intervention. For example, Gumm et al (2011) describe recent interactions between two endangered fish species; as habitat became more restricted, one began to prey on the eggs of the other, contributing to its decline. By expanding and restoring breeding habitats, managers were able to decrease egg predation rates and populations rebounded (Gumm et al 2011).…”
Section: Complications Of Joint Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gumm et al (2011) describe recent interactions between two endangered fish species; as habitat became more restricted, one began to prey on the eggs of the other, contributing to its decline. By expanding and restoring breeding habitats, managers were able to decrease egg predation rates and populations rebounded (Gumm et al 2011). Finally, where a plant and herbivore interact strongly with sublethal effects for the plant (e.g., Kincaid's lupine and Fender's blue butterfly), habitat improvements included vigorous seeding of host plants (Schultz 2001).…”
Section: Complications Of Joint Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fishes have been monitored for almost two decades, and significant pupfish population reductions have been apparent, with just one territorial male in 2006 (Gumm et al 2008) down from over 50 territorial males in 1998 (Leiser & Itzkowitz 2003). The initial loss of about half of the pupfish territories is attributed to emergent plants, such as bulrush (Scripus robustus), which eliminated large portions of the pupfish's spawning areas (Gumm et al 2011). The remaining decline appears to be due to egg predation by gambusia (Gumm et al 2008(Gumm et al , 2011, similar to the effects invasive gambusia have on other pupfish (Rogowski & Stockwell 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial loss of about half of the pupfish territories is attributed to emergent plants, such as bulrush (Scripus robustus), which eliminated large portions of the pupfish's spawning areas (Gumm et al 2011). The remaining decline appears to be due to egg predation by gambusia (Gumm et al 2008(Gumm et al , 2011, similar to the effects invasive gambusia have on other pupfish (Rogowski & Stockwell 2006). Prior to the loss of habitat, gambusia were spread through many territories, making their impact on spawning pairs negligible (Leiser & Itzkowitz 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%