2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of initial and recurrent radiation-induced contrast enhancements following radiotherapy for brain metastases: Clinical and radiological impact of bevacizumab and corticosteroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight fractions of the initial SRS may render the surrounding brain immune to a significant ARE after re-SRS with the high BED 10 . Bevacizumab, which was included in chemoimmunotherapy, could also attenuate AREs; however, mild radiation-induced edema appeared only in the right frontal lobe after discontinuation (Figures 6A - 6L , 7A - 7L ) [ 18 ]. Taken together, the criteria for determining the dominance of tumor regrowth and indication for re-SRS may include the following: insufficient GTV coverage (<98%) with a BED 10 of 80 Gy, relatively homogeneous GTV doses, and dose/fractionation selection with adequate consideration of brain tolerance and volume effects in prior mfSRS, in addition to progression with T1/T2 matching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight fractions of the initial SRS may render the surrounding brain immune to a significant ARE after re-SRS with the high BED 10 . Bevacizumab, which was included in chemoimmunotherapy, could also attenuate AREs; however, mild radiation-induced edema appeared only in the right frontal lobe after discontinuation (Figures 6A - 6L , 7A - 7L ) [ 18 ]. Taken together, the criteria for determining the dominance of tumor regrowth and indication for re-SRS may include the following: insufficient GTV coverage (<98%) with a BED 10 of 80 Gy, relatively homogeneous GTV doses, and dose/fractionation selection with adequate consideration of brain tolerance and volume effects in prior mfSRS, in addition to progression with T1/T2 matching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with most high dose cerebral irradiations, there is a signi cant risk for radiation necrosis (RN) of brain tissue, especially after re-RT. Literature describes radiation induced contrast enhancement (RICE) as a term to morphologically describe said contrast enhancement in the brain tissue after RT, which can include blood-brain barrier lesions, pseudoprogression or even RN [14,15]. Since only neurosurgery and pathology can safely distinguish between the different RICE lesions but is not always safely amenable in patients -especially after multiple surgeries already -de nitive diagnosis and therefore treatment has proven to be di cult [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tissue (RICE)[14], all of which could be classi ed as CTCAE II°. Patient A had RICE after proton radiotherapy (60 Gy) in the primary situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As CNS SFTs have a high tendency for recurrence [9], salvage therapies are also an active area of current research. Intracranial reirradiation carries high risks of toxicities and adverse events particularly when dose escalation is required [14,15]. Fortunately, modern radiation techniques and modalities could provide broadened options for re-RT in patients with recurrent SFTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%