1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-2081(95)80027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of infection and occlusion associated with vascular access devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristics that contribute to catheter occlusion include catheter composition, catheter size, various patient factors, infusate composition, local catheter use protocols, and the use of connector devices. [3][4][5] A variety of needleless connector devices has been marketed, with claims that they can decrease central venous catheter occlusion and infection rates by preventing reflux of blood through the catheter tip. Needleless connector devices are currently available with 4 basic designs: standard (no valve), single valve, dual valve, and positive pressure valve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics that contribute to catheter occlusion include catheter composition, catheter size, various patient factors, infusate composition, local catheter use protocols, and the use of connector devices. [3][4][5] A variety of needleless connector devices has been marketed, with claims that they can decrease central venous catheter occlusion and infection rates by preventing reflux of blood through the catheter tip. Needleless connector devices are currently available with 4 basic designs: standard (no valve), single valve, dual valve, and positive pressure valve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General nursing knowledge demonstrates that inspecting solutions and medications for precipitates prior to infusion, using proper technique when obtaining blood samples, flushing after samples are obtained, monitoring fluids that are likely to precipitate, and patient education of PICC protocols will likely reduce the number of PICC occlusions (Rumsey, 1995). There is currently debate surrounding the proper protocol for flushing of PICCs and whether saline or heparin is more appropriate, however, standardized flushing protocols are noted to decrease occlusion rates.…”
Section: Non-research Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently debate surrounding the proper protocol for flushing of PICCs and whether saline or heparin is more appropriate, however, standardized flushing protocols are noted to decrease occlusion rates. (Rumsey, 1995) and (Gorsky, 2005) There have also been economic savings reported with the use of valved PICCs due to decreased number of repeat procedures secondary to occlusions and infections. There are also cost savings related to the ability to use saline as a flushing solution in the valved PICCs, which is significantly cheaper than heparinized flushes.…”
Section: Non-research Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an ideal breeding ground for bacteria and can result in the colonisation of the catheter system [175], [176]. …”
Section: Central Venous Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%