2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06485.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of incidental impalpable intratesticular masses of ≤ 5 mm in diameter

Abstract: age of the patients was 36.4 (26-58) years. Four men (20%) had orchidectomy because the tumours were found to be malignant; the resected specimens yielded multifocal testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN) in all patients and additional seminomatous tumour cells elsewhere in the testis in one. Frozen-section results were false-negative in one patient and he had orchidectomy after having established the definitive histological diagnosis. The 16 patients with benign lesions were correctly diagnosed and their … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of lesions less than 5 mm (4/8), we founded a seminoma in two case (50%) and a benign Leydig cell tumor in one case (25%). Muller et al (11) reported a series of 20 men diagnosed with a tumor mean diameter of 3.5 mm with four patients (20%) who underwent an IRO because the lesions were found to be malignant. In all case, the resected specimen revealed a multifocal TIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of lesions less than 5 mm (4/8), we founded a seminoma in two case (50%) and a benign Leydig cell tumor in one case (25%). Muller et al (11) reported a series of 20 men diagnosed with a tumor mean diameter of 3.5 mm with four patients (20%) who underwent an IRO because the lesions were found to be malignant. In all case, the resected specimen revealed a multifocal TIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several case series have reported on the malignant risk of small, incidentally-detected testicular masses, results have been contradictory [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. We report our experience in a contemporary series of patients who underwent radical orchidectomy for non-palpable testicular masses and comment on their malignant potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An obvious disadvantage is the investigatordependence, with sometimes poor documentation [6]. Nevertheless, SUS is highly sensitive for detecting testicular tumours, but with the disadvantage of low specificity [3]. Because of this, surgical exploration is indicated if an intratesticular lesion has been detected by SUS, even if there is no clear suspicion of malignancy [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%