Management of Hazardous Waste and Contaminated Land

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: Regulation of hazardous waste and cleanup of contaminated sites are two major components of modern public policy for environmental protection. We review the literature on these related areas, with emphasis on empirical analyses. Researchers have identified many behavioral responses to regulation of hazardous waste, including changes in the location of economic activity. However, the drivers behind compliance with these costly regulations remain a puzzle, as most research suggests a limited role for conventional enforcement. Increasingly sophisticated research examines the benefits of cleanup of contaminated sites, yet controversy remains about whether the benefits of cleanup in the U.S. exceed its costs. Finally, research focusing on the imposition of legal liability for damages from hazardous waste finds advantages and disadvantages of the U.S. reliance on legal liability to pay for cleanup, as opposed to the government-financed approaches more common in Europe. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor mayAcknowledgements: Prepared for the Annual Review of Resource Economics, vol 3., 2011. We are grateful to Erin Cochran for research assistance.

The Sopranos Redux: The Empirical Economics of Waste Crime

“…Appropriately, understanding whether the environmental monitoring and enforcement strategies used in environmental policy are indeed effective has attracted considerable research interest over the last 30 years, particularly in the United States (for surveys, see GRAY and SHIMSHACK, 2011;SIGMAN and STAFFORD, 2011;ROUSSEAU, 2009;and COHEN, 1999). The evidence unearthed by this research provides support for the conclusion that individuals and entities targeted by enforcement agencies comply more with environmental regulation than those that are not, and that compliance increases with more enforcement.…”

Undermining methodological nationalism: Cosmopolitan analysis and visualization of the North American hazardous waste trade

“…Cohen and Bakker, 2014;Ekers and Prudham, 2015). Such a case has been made for domestic hazardous waste management (Hunter and Leyden, 1995;Levinson, 1999;McAvoy, 1994McAvoy, , 1998Ringquist, 1994;Sigman, 1996;Sigman and Stafford, 2011), but without consideration of the influence of transnational trade and international regulation.…”

Do Superfund Sites Affect Local Property Values? Evidence from a Spatial Hedonic Approach

“…4 The absence of important data results in an endogeneity problem, making estimated coefficients biased and inefficient. The repeat sales model is one method to control omitted variable bias in the HPM context (Sigman and Stafford, 2010) by incorporating changes in property value for the same property to control for unobservable time-invariant characteristics, such as neighborhood. , , Case, et al (2006), and Gamper- Rabindran and Timmins (2013) use the repeat sales model to study Superfund sites.…”

“…Another approach used by Sigman and Stafford (2010) and U.S. EPA (2011) is the quasiexperimental method to avoid omitted variable bias and deal with unobserved heterogeneity.…”