2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0157-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations

Abstract: Clinical and radiographic features can be used to determine the surgical or conservative treatment of ERCP-related duodenal perforations, whereas patient age and intraoperative findings can determine the final outcome and morbidity or mortality. The interval between the perforation and the operation is of great significance. The mortality rate increases dramatically with late surgical management (>24 h). An algorithm for the selective management of ERCP-induced duodenal perforations is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
2
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
70
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, persistence with conservative treatment in the absence of signs of improvement should be avoided as the mortality rate increases dramatically with delayed surgical intervention. 8,9 In Patient 4, the florid abdominal signs, in addition to the presence of fever and leucocytosis, militated against conservative treatment. Nevertheless, careful interpretation of the ERCP and CT, revealed a rarely reported guidewire injury of the pancreatic duct, resulting in peripancreatic air collection (Figs 5 and 6), which was assumed to respond well to conservative treatment.…”
Section: Operative Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, persistence with conservative treatment in the absence of signs of improvement should be avoided as the mortality rate increases dramatically with delayed surgical intervention. 8,9 In Patient 4, the florid abdominal signs, in addition to the presence of fever and leucocytosis, militated against conservative treatment. Nevertheless, careful interpretation of the ERCP and CT, revealed a rarely reported guidewire injury of the pancreatic duct, resulting in peripancreatic air collection (Figs 5 and 6), which was assumed to respond well to conservative treatment.…”
Section: Operative Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Free air in an otherwise asymptomatic patient can be categorized as type IV injury and needs no surgical intervention, though the patient may require close monitoring to ensure peritoneal signs do not develop; 6,15 this type of injury was most common in our series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1 While relatively safe, ERCP is still associated with complications, most commonly pancreatitis, post-sphincterotomy bleeding and perforation. 2,3 Perforations are one of the most dreaded complications of ERCP, with a reported incidence of 0.3-6%; [3][4][5][6][7] however, this data has come from retrospective database studies, case series or older studies. Studies from large prospective databases or from large tertiary centers in the current era of therapeutic ERCP are few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the past decade the management has evolved towards a selective approach. [3][4][5][6][7][8] ERCP induced perforation (major complications 5.4%-23.0%, mortality 0.1-1%) [14][15][16][17] may be retroperitoneal (typically in peri-ampullary region due to sphincterotomy or guidewire usage) or intra-peritoneal (typically in the lateral wall and endoscopy related). 1,2,7,9,12,[14][15][16][17] Depending on the perforation location the treatment can be conservative or operative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delay in the diagnosis and intervention, leads to significantly higher mortality (8-23%) as a consequence of sepsis and multi-organ failure. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Traditionally traumatic and non-traumatic duodenal perforations have been managed surgically. However, in the past decade the management has evolved towards a selective approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%