2021
DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer: ASCO Guideline

Abstract: PURPOSE To provide guidance on the clinical management of dyspnea in adult patients with advanced cancer. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) systematic review provided the evidence base for nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions to alleviate dyspnea. The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with a concurrent comparison group published through early May… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
115
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
(189 reference statements)
6
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most clinicians in our focus groups were unfamiliar with published evidence for the fan’s effectiveness from RCTs or related guideline recommendations. Most guidelines recommending the fan for chronic breathlessness either focus specifically on cancer [ 17 , 18 ] or are for palliative care more generally [ 40 – 42 ], with only the New Zealand COPD Guidelines [ 43 ] and a ‘workshop report’ from the American Thoracic Society (ATS) targeted at specialist respiratory clinicians [ 9 ]. The fan could be recommended across a wide range of respiratory guidelines and clinical pathways, including those for pulmonary rehabilitation and inpatient or outpatient management of breathlessness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most clinicians in our focus groups were unfamiliar with published evidence for the fan’s effectiveness from RCTs or related guideline recommendations. Most guidelines recommending the fan for chronic breathlessness either focus specifically on cancer [ 17 , 18 ] or are for palliative care more generally [ 40 – 42 ], with only the New Zealand COPD Guidelines [ 43 ] and a ‘workshop report’ from the American Thoracic Society (ATS) targeted at specialist respiratory clinicians [ 9 ]. The fan could be recommended across a wide range of respiratory guidelines and clinical pathways, including those for pulmonary rehabilitation and inpatient or outpatient management of breathlessness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fan’s potential for benefit, few disadvantages and low cost combine with its portability to warrant its implementation as a ‘first-line’ intervention for amelioration of chronic breathlessness that should be recommended to all affected patients alongside disease-directed treatments [ 9 , 17 , 18 ]. However-as for many evidence-based interventions-specific efforts may be needed to drive implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palliative care teams can provide a variety of non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic measures to alleviate symptoms such as pain, dyspnea and nausea when they first present. Subsequent visits can allow the palliative care team to optimize symptom control by providing therapeutic trials, active titration, proper education, longitudinal monitoring, and reinforcement of treatment adherence [ 32 , 33 ]. Successful symptom management not only improves quality of life, but also prevents escalation of symptoms leading to avoidable emergency room visits and hospitalizations [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Rationale For Timely Palliative Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For dyspnoea, the initial focus should be on optimising treatment of a patient’s underlying disease. 63 , 64 Treating potentially reversible causes should be considered. Non-pharmacological treatment could provide short-term benefit but at EoL this may not be tolerated.…”
Section: Symptom Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%